Re: [ipwave] RFC8902 - TLS with ITS Certificates, EXPERIMENTAL, and the one PKI and one Internet

Mounira MSAHLI <> Mon, 26 April 2021 14:08 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA1FA3A20F5 for <>; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 07:08:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.848
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.848 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GH_6hlnwxHOn for <>; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 07:08:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f2b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 026933A20F4 for <>; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 07:08:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id a30so502892qvb.12 for <>; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 07:08:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=mWmkSga5ObI6Co676IR+HMBIJnKBEEsKkLqly7D87/k=; b=Gjmeyj5RR6eaLINZWv5Gm/XAzEIvSyFPnliWTDHBhtjjHvKQT++5MXCcI3Bg403qjN m1hYlHwGupvQLYg4mHp7DATccV5v5KoY2PGhrpKDGBjXYJZYbTME3B/lddJGWwLCiosY aD2Uep31qb0aPT+p9xaZQq29qRhcZKMXfSJEjIJZ+vH8KzrV7TXHD1nEu/Exrha0S7+b nSaAJazAnLdbl1Qp0d4uVYGTknAZ5AL5fiDYnNLocmfdZ0HXBUkMRPIsGBYy1FQA5rQ/ 9wr/midBAv0fiTtt24/K/TNXT3yLnF35Qey9qLm6K/Q7uEOFpbrdx1OdVUaMYb4JM/+8 kaXQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=mWmkSga5ObI6Co676IR+HMBIJnKBEEsKkLqly7D87/k=; b=S07Et8zw/VcKPqGLaijqyQgEbzcL8GISAhRhAMEuKeeODOyjqBvV/rcCXam/WDiDcG QDFWMZ9qhcN2Ifq0Y6TezB/jHxQuZvIqQVVpbj20bFnc58a7TyJyTyL42h/8dQ4l0YTi V+uygkQdifwCla/CTVSTOryVb8Z5g1aYwpAn/sj+Gw1pu01Nn36cgE0khffv/6bqd5XW HvODylQNuX0r9qKgZeV2fnVFjtqSLuhA7Vfg3//GKy8mKO0D7oQCd0WIhpg30mBLwHe+ 7XBeoUTrElPhtEQl4d5L+/kIXy5+mOtJdH+iT7mGKETcVbvQJCVuxBc4h2c/A91NTHZt YqqA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530exSYgI0eanQfmIOf3TlW0rg6zOcody+rF7SF1eI1EdLxNBuG8 iiWtG19GVOnqSDLBvu9MgnBG91VcLUxevdyoFfNunWdxxfY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz5Qypddn2KHOTNTHPw/lj/a3XU+1V/Uoa2YESlSsvUMYr9fuvmXILwVXCTmZrWW8cD5Br3fc0zYKAHH5+V+bw=
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:9e0f:: with SMTP id p15mr17706559qve.27.1619446087822; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 07:08:07 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <> <01d601d731e3$140e2ed0$3c2a8c70$> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
From: Mounira MSAHLI <>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 16:07:56 +0200
Message-ID: <>
To: Alexandre Petrescu <>,
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000cc343405c0e0ac1c"
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [ipwave] RFC8902 - TLS with ITS Certificates, EXPERIMENTAL, and the one PKI and one Internet
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPWAVE - IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments WG at IETF <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 14:08:13 -0000

>> If there were a need to discuss that RFC then it would have been
discussed publicly when it was an I-D.

>> This is not a negative remark, and all RFCs that go through detailed
reviews, as this one has, are useful.  Better have an RFC on the topic
rather than silence.

In my memory, the RFC was presented by William in IPWAVE GROUP in 2019. But
IPWAVE did not host this activity as it was outside the charter as
currently written. Although there was a possibility to rewrite the charter,
but we had to wait until the two current documents being worked on by
IPWAVE had been completed so as not to defocus the group.

If your conclusion is that « this RFC is not really relevant to ITS", this
is hard to agree with because the large deployment of C-ITS. As mentioned
by William before, ITS deployments across the US, Europe and Australia are
currently using 1609.2 certificates.