IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ipwave] Intdir early review of draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-34 - MAC-based IIDs during transition

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Mon, 08 April 2019 09:11 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98ADE1202D6; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 02:11:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.633
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.633 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6_HTsQLmbWmb; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 02:10:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oxalide-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (oxalide-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.168.224.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B0811202D5; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 02:10:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by oxalide-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id x389Ar36155875; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 11:10:53 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 153E82038D0; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 11:10:53 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet1-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet1-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.12]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id F06DC20203F; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 11:10:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.8.35.150] (is154594.intra.cea.fr [10.8.35.150]) by muguet1-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id x389AqY1031798; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 11:10:52 +0200
To: Pascal Thubert <pthubert@cisco.com>
Cc: int-dir@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, its@ietf.org, draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb.all@ietf.org
References: <155169869045.5118.3508360720339540639@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <19b820f7-67a6-117c-d6a1-29a598d1d0c9@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2019 11:10:52 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <155169869045.5118.3508360720339540639@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/its/CactRy8iAGGZ715zQ9U7NZnaNUU>
Subject: Re: [ipwave] Intdir early review of draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-34 - MAC-based IIDs during transition
X-BeenThere: its@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPWAVE - IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments WG at IETF <its.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/its/>
List-Post: <mailto:its@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2019 09:11:01 -0000

Le 04/03/2019 à 12:24, Pascal Thubert a écrit :
> Reviewer: Pascal Thubert Review result: Not Ready
[...]
> The method of forming IIDs described in section 4 of [RFC2464] MAY be
> used during transition time. " Contradicts section 4.3 that says " 
> Among these types of addresses only the IPv6 link-local addresses MAY
> be formed using an EUI-64 identifier. "

Thank you for pointing this.  I would not qualify it as a strong 
contradiction though.  It's not like one was MUST and the other MUST 
NOT.  They are both 'MAY'.

To clarify, I propose I add 'for lls' and 'during transition time':

NEW:
> The method of forming IIDs described in section 4 of [RFC2464] MAY be
> used during transition time, in particular for IPv6 link-local
> addresses.
[...]
> Among these types of addresses only the IPv6 link-local addresses MAY
> be formed using an EUI-64 identifier, in particular during transition
> time.

Do you disagree?

Alex

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email