Re: [ipwave] Intdir early review of draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-34

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Mon, 08 April 2019 19:08 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0F6712032B for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 12:08:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z8ZpBhPs1boV for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 12:08:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D47081200A2 for <its@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 12:08:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from client-0253.vpn.uni-bremen.de (client-0253.vpn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.107.253]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 44dKgv67p9zySQ; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 21:08:11 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <CALypLp9SuURGJ4f8FBzZg1WQOo9B4xsB8Y4uGW+Jtfm2b=8Sww@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2019 21:08:10 +0200
Cc: Pascal Thubert <pthubert@cisco.com>, "Stanley, Dorothy" <dorothy.stanley@hpe.com>, "int-ads@tools.ietf.org" <int-ads@tools.ietf.org>, Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>, "its@ietf.org" <its@ietf.org>
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 576443289.045575-d98190eecdade26bff2b97c6f0133f2f
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <92507EE2-4336-49B3-B9C5-85EB8A8E60CD@tzi.org>
References: <155169869045.5118.3508360720339540639@ietfa.amsl.com> <9d5c8168-a915-358e-d7eb-0362cad96d81@gmail.com> <27AE185B-1D95-4DCD-8C76-AECE90E46802@cisco.com> <MN2PR11MB35651C4D8957516CF034BFADD8510@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CALypLp9SuURGJ4f8FBzZg1WQOo9B4xsB8Y4uGW+Jtfm2b=8Sww@mail.gmail.com>
To: CARLOS JESUS BERNARDOS CANO <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/its/Dzt43Fq0EoD1TeNnbPjBXKfcggI>
Subject: Re: [ipwave] Intdir early review of draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-34
X-BeenThere: its@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPWAVE - IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments WG at IETF <its.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/its/>
List-Post: <mailto:its@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2019 19:08:17 -0000

On Apr 8, 2019, at 21:03, CARLOS JESUS BERNARDOS CANO <cjbc@it.uc3m.es> wrote:
> 
> - I tend to agree with Alex in that I’d skip the RECOMMENDED part of the text (referring to RFC 8505).

What would that even mean?

If I come up as an OCB node, how do I know if I should act as an ND-classic node or as an efficient-ND (RFC 6775/8505, whatever) node?  RECOMMENDED does not cut it here.  The IP-over-foo document needs to tell me.

Grüße, Carsten