Re: [ipwave] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ipwave-vehicular-networking-14.txt

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Thu, 12 March 2020 12:13 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A42B63A0ED6 for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 05:13:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.669
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.669 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD=1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 57_WILcvuDBd for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 05:13:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7581A3A0CC1 for <its@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 05:13:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by sainfoin-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 02CCDM0i019908 for <its@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 13:13:22 +0100
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 68F4C205A49 for <its@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 13:13:22 +0100 (CET)
Received: from muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.13]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EFD62059FB for <its@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 13:13:22 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.11.240.10] ([10.11.240.10]) by muguet2-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 02CCDLPI019511 for <its@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 13:13:22 +0100
To: its@ietf.org
References: <202003121226099565915@cnnic.cn>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5a137162-ce2e-2324-13f5-e39ba4527a64@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 13:13:21 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <202003121226099565915@cnnic.cn>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gbk"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/its/E6QdpbfX51QwIi9C1gY5vu08IZg>
Subject: Re: [ipwave] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ipwave-vehicular-networking-14.txt
X-BeenThere: its@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPWAVE - IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments WG at IETF <its.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/its/>
List-Post: <mailto:its@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 12:13:27 -0000


Le 12/03/2020 à 05:26, Z.W. Yan a écrit :
[...]
> 7) In Subsection 4.1, the PMIPv6 is mentioned but it is very
> unexpected and sudden. It’s better if the elements in Figure 1 can be
> explained first, and then the related communications can be explained
> and at last the adopted and extended protocols involved (such as OCB
> and PMIP) can be explained.

I tend to agree with the suggestion.

In addition, I would like to suggest to also use the term "Internet" in 
the figure.  Maybe paste "Internet" on the cloud, or similar.

(I also value the other comments in this review, that I deleted here, 
but are present in the original review).

Alex