Re: [ipwave] Intdir early review of draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-34

Suresh Krishnan <Suresh@kaloom.com> Tue, 09 April 2019 16:04 UTC

Return-Path: <Suresh@kaloom.com>
X-Original-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DDDD12089B for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 09:04:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kaloom.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kKRp-h7-b5nk for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 09:04:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from CAN01-TO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr670121.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.67.121]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F9CB120106 for <its@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 09:04:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kaloom.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=OYVU2ZeahOQNE8RfiSfW5czLXBodUjwrjKHHlir0wts=; b=l1rZIxj/z4FIw3D1D4+N0g3M2hL/BxXjH9LgEgAYJ3h1VPHcydvLlpt9c4XrLVyQK9busfMaXyhXtrVsQHy0ICqBhAc5uYZ80PCzXa82g9rilwI+F9mzSbADiXTnsCJwrfHi8au+dxrwBRQhEf8nU6Tcx4KETIS0rev4ifAhyCc=
Received: from YTOPR0101MB1819.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (52.132.44.159) by YTOPR0101MB1321.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (52.132.45.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1771.16; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 16:04:48 +0000
Received: from YTOPR0101MB1819.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::7d75:b044:39b8:d47e]) by YTOPR0101MB1819.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::7d75:b044:39b8:d47e%5]) with mapi id 15.20.1771.016; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 16:04:48 +0000
From: Suresh Krishnan <Suresh@kaloom.com>
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>, "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
CC: CARLOS JESUS BERNARDOS CANO <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>, "its@ietf.org" <its@ietf.org>, "int-ads@tools.ietf.org" <int-ads@tools.ietf.org>, "Stanley, Dorothy" <dorothy.stanley@hpe.com>
Thread-Topic: Intdir early review of draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-34
Thread-Index: AQHU0nzjsK13n6051U6FhLRoAV8y1qYg13kjgAzd3iCABSEagIAAVDaAgADnx4CAACSOgA==
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2019 16:04:48 +0000
Message-ID: <613CAFD7-ED72-4523-A58F-B5BE6C38448B@kaloom.com>
References: <155169869045.5118.3508360720339540639@ietfa.amsl.com> <9d5c8168-a915-358e-d7eb-0362cad96d81@gmail.com> <27AE185B-1D95-4DCD-8C76-AECE90E46802@cisco.com> <MN2PR11MB35651C4D8957516CF034BFADD8510@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CALypLp9SuURGJ4f8FBzZg1WQOo9B4xsB8Y4uGW+Jtfm2b=8Sww@mail.gmail.com> <F4BC9027-35E0-4ADB-845A-15B5DD27C069@cisco.com> <64e1744b-6fc6-17b8-0186-399dd0fe91fc@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <64e1744b-6fc6-17b8-0186-399dd0fe91fc@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=Suresh@kaloom.com;
x-originating-ip: [45.19.110.76]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: d55e2402-c8c6-4411-4838-08d6bd051788
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(7021145)(8989299)(4534185)(7022145)(4603075)(4627221)(201702281549075)(8990200)(7048125)(7024125)(7027125)(7023125)(5600139)(711020)(4605104)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:YTOPR0101MB1321;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: YTOPR0101MB1321:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <YTOPR0101MB1321246A1CAF5A46EC5EFFA8B42D0@YTOPR0101MB1321.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
x-forefront-prvs: 000227DA0C
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(396003)(366004)(39840400004)(136003)(346002)(376002)(199004)(189003)(72206003)(110136005)(68736007)(25786009)(486006)(4326008)(14454004)(33656002)(229853002)(6436002)(76176011)(508600001)(53936002)(11346002)(6116002)(6512007)(6486002)(446003)(476003)(6246003)(6506007)(102836004)(2616005)(26005)(2906002)(53546011)(186003)(54906003)(66066001)(99286004)(71200400001)(71190400001)(305945005)(82746002)(106356001)(316002)(83716004)(80792005)(105586002)(4744005)(93886005)(7736002)(97736004)(66574012)(36756003)(8936002)(81156014)(8676002)(86362001)(5660300002)(256004)(3846002)(81166006); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:YTOPR0101MB1321; H:YTOPR0101MB1819.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: kaloom.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: ySpehg70N2rWS17fUlQbqYxrYtykaqUIrkPgxvTqX+EaIhhx5LXfLVn4sohm12QQdLUUPUl2XqzlGzTpAZwM4ppOIrfkTEG4jjx4QZcZsTUscxOb2GiZy4RDCAs4VY0l7lGDkvlfsvOVXXxv3c4/uN4vNj2ew0IWEhU1OuWxJIZt5RX7EnYhtxcpv4X7uq5uF+JIl8NJssQZ/053T0ww8qBc0Xki9wU1byzienq+GEDYNqO+WXby7WrwgVRx2rso//EYJqAZzHwig34iwsQB1XuKCKYS2m0eARXIAFhc3Wn1ibsvb3FFZ0hW8Gl2wxq5W89sYpR79GCODDo4gD8wAp7dbhNwbeEVvZwsur7ay8HC3eqB1iVqU8Y1SZa7+UL55cOt3jUVo7LVeVVevF3vw55sYLdyKpgLzs8WYGUO9To=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <86EB6EDFA726F445B87F9154E41B4AEE@CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: kaloom.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: d55e2402-c8c6-4411-4838-08d6bd051788
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 09 Apr 2019 16:04:48.6096 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 47d58e26-f796-48e8-ac40-1c365c204513
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: YTOPR0101MB1321
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/its/FsMaqf7_tkIlH8AFgnIPFUBRNiE>
Subject: Re: [ipwave] Intdir early review of draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-34
X-BeenThere: its@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPWAVE - IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments WG at IETF <its.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/its/>
List-Post: <mailto:its@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2019 16:04:53 -0000

Hi Pascal/Alex,
  Upleveling this a bit.

> On Apr 9, 2019, at 9:54 AM, Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Le 09/04/2019 à 02:04, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) a écrit :
>> Hello Carlos
>> I think we’re a bit stuck.
>>  I spent really a long time explaining why RFC 4861 does not cut it
> 
> Pascal, with all due respect.
> 
> You seem to be claiming RFC4861 does not work on WiFi altogether.
> 
> Is it so?

Pascal, we do know that RFC4861 ND *does* work on 802.11 OCB networks as witnessed by the several existing implementations. Of course, there are cases where it may may be sub optimal and this is why I was fine with explaining some of the shortfalls with an informational pointer to RFC8505 (Thanks for helping with the text!! I think it provides a great overview). I personally do not think mandating RFC8505 is warranted at this point. 

Thanks
Suresh