Re: [ipwave] Feedback from ITU-R CITS about IP and cellular for vehicular networks

[...]

> There might be other problems with IP on C-V2X on a car-to-car
> without base station scenario.
> 
> */[RR] Like there being NO layer-2 addressing in C-V2X … ONLy 
> broadcasts! Just imagine how efficient that will be! /*

It sounds as if one has read a specification of C-V2X and has seen the 
C-V2X headers and in these headers there are no addresses.

Can I see that?

Alex

> 
> Alex
> 
> Le 04/10/2021 à 11:52, Alexandre Petrescu a écrit :
> 
>> Hi, IPWAVErs,
> 
>> 
> 
>> I gave a brief presentation of the IPWAVE WG, RFC8691 and
>> Vehicular
> 
>> Networks I-D to the ITU CITS 'Collaboration on ITS Standards', in
> 
>> September, 2021.
> 
>> 
> 
>> This is the feedback I received:
> 
>> 
> 
>> Bring the cellular kind of work, like  IP-over-cellular, in
> 
>> IPWAVE WG.  This request is so  because:
> 
>> - because China efforts on cellular and because
> 
>> USA FCC  regulation changes at 5.9GHz to include
> 
>> C-V2X  ('C'==cellular).
> 
>> - because at ETSI it  is thought that it is easy
> 
>> to do IP  over any access layer, be it 802.11-OCB
> 
>> or a  cellular kind of link layer.
> 
>> 
> 
>> What do you think?
> 
>> 
> 
>> Alex
> 
>> 
> 
>> _______________________________________________
> 
>> its mailing list
> 
>> its@ietf.org
> 
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> its mailing list
> 
> its@ietf.org
> 
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its
> 