Re: [ipwave] Feedback from ITU-R CITS about IP and cellular for vehicular networks
Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Tue, 05 October 2021 12:28 UTC
Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90FDF3A0B9F for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 05:28:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.667
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.667 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD=1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m30FUZxdZcT1 for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 05:28:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77F323A0B9E for <its@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 05:28:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by sainfoin-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 195CSpnq009776; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 14:28:51 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 19BCD206FF9; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 14:28:51 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.13]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D9FD2049F2; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 14:28:51 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.8.35.150] (is154594.intra.cea.fr [10.8.35.150]) by muguet2-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 195CSom0013880; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 14:28:51 +0200
To: dickroy@alum.mit.edu, its@ietf.org
References: <8d49b3c9-f0cc-6896-b906-b7c4b92367af@gmail.com> <1650abc2-8008-4b23-c0c6-a3c32e497edd@gmail.com> <58EA7A21BDF94709893836420F54177A@SRA6>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <ebf84b99-faef-93ef-5d8b-b2825fa3ffe5@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2021 14:28:51 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <58EA7A21BDF94709893836420F54177A@SRA6>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/its/HRj8KLayQynbU-0XJDdOocoDue0>
Subject: Re: [ipwave] Feedback from ITU-R CITS about IP and cellular for vehicular networks
X-BeenThere: its@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPWAVE - IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments WG at IETF <its.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/its/>
List-Post: <mailto:its@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2021 12:29:00 -0000
[...] > There might be other problems with IP on C-V2X on a car-to-car > without base station scenario. > > */[RR] Like there being NO layer-2 addressing in C-V2X … ONLy > broadcasts! Just imagine how efficient that will be! /* It sounds as if one has read a specification of C-V2X and has seen the C-V2X headers and in these headers there are no addresses. Can I see that? Alex > > Alex > > Le 04/10/2021 à 11:52, Alexandre Petrescu a écrit : > >> Hi, IPWAVErs, > >> > >> I gave a brief presentation of the IPWAVE WG, RFC8691 and >> Vehicular > >> Networks I-D to the ITU CITS 'Collaboration on ITS Standards', in > >> September, 2021. > >> > >> This is the feedback I received: > >> > >> Bring the cellular kind of work, like IP-over-cellular, in > >> IPWAVE WG. This request is so because: > >> - because China efforts on cellular and because > >> USA FCC regulation changes at 5.9GHz to include > >> C-V2X ('C'==cellular). > >> - because at ETSI it is thought that it is easy > >> to do IP over any access layer, be it 802.11-OCB > >> or a cellular kind of link layer. > >> > >> What do you think? > >> > >> Alex > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> its mailing list > >> its@ietf.org > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its > > _______________________________________________ > > its mailing list > > its@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its >
- [ipwave] Feedback from ITU-R CITS about IP and ce… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [ipwave] Feedback from ITU-R CITS about IP an… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [ipwave] Feedback from ITU-R CITS about IP an… Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: [ipwave] Feedback from ITU-R CITS about IP an… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [ipwave] Feedback from ITU-R CITS about IP an… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [ipwave] J3161 Alexandre Petrescu