Re: [ipwave] Intdir last call review of draft-ietf-ipwave-vehicular-networking-20

"Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong" <jaehoon.paul@gmail.com> Sat, 18 September 2021 01:16 UTC

Return-Path: <jaehoon.paul@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 227133A1EEC for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 18:16:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.556
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.556 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HK_NAME_FM_MR_MRS=0.542, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ks_SMfHBx3Nk for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 18:16:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x136.google.com (mail-lf1-x136.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 938213A1EEB for <its@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 18:16:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x136.google.com with SMTP id g1so40513461lfj.12 for <its@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 18:16:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=+9Sdvn4Yti9uotUtw8HJBmAh0y2dDez3Dn+Cj76B6VM=; b=dhh6r0YNSJDeEOqG2janlGp4RMxYo9flaRkX4Q5StFcbS0lEOKYrDH1k/ZfDkJ/V5X tOrxxPn2LU55lK+7WITGnX3FE1qtJeeSn8bHUVJVOl2MExft1RW36Xh6hecCGaE/iIC/ Vi2gXQisYH05AuD3wk8ZPwemnH8pk4WmpaUZ6EozVTTD/ulmA+fMAZYBkglmnbPL0yBJ TYekF1RjyF4mghRHDYBhL34mzCco0N6682TlaWcCYZ1VciwS2u2lton3C8Q7KX1U69vb zHklQ9+qgCSxSPVOO576MAyAluI/LsEbeVIkXz+GDQ6E+hrluVrSsojRcyxGmfUbuEzn 8ulA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+9Sdvn4Yti9uotUtw8HJBmAh0y2dDez3Dn+Cj76B6VM=; b=F8r+PUdBC8nWgdioc/T1Lni7iY2xagq3AAQOEOijCP1BV4HoR6ScbrmI12LyUDKO6v qV+U8pF3iOoO1W+mvPu0ghQYDj75v+ydg/QiCgHWX2KHqIoc7p30k7cQDEcQcIhUR0h9 Oyq/OLbw7xDWFOVTuA8x9pnogQjyK0xNjRamrBMonmahNqAYxCTq9mcIJctoKFS/YgXh /gIIYmisgWQ/og7aHosWzE3vJKdP4dRozZaEEFJ4SaojJc6lj4dLNcBCcMLoEnaxRr4G SLAh/MgIhRqljU+HYHOTBUVWyMRn0/AR8B891Rt/oGLafe2kindW70p2pQgtSGU6iAVZ YlIA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532IxM7KZQZvsb86nZKU9gWC2j+rYH9ul2EXEnSgcb1Eq5nLuJLL hZPma71LWKJVq89/A21v8US4ta0Od6XNjo9ic+bliV+Z
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxUfEB3qWn4c2BQQYbdlC+cPym/Qr2A3c71Y7GBbHJ/AXaS54Z7BSrd9XJQ6RfRCEH7tzOMeVpteUljZf1KyRA=
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:558a:: with SMTP id v10mr10024110lfg.338.1631927762338; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 18:16:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <162400216663.17839.1738900015320888640@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAPK2DezN9benfLS9VQw1uS9cEXMQFjrs_m-jJu+3JtgCrfBWWQ@mail.gmail.com> <CO1PR11MB48811753BC5EC02469400262D8CE9@CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <b362d808-3db4-c0c4-cf25-57f50d10bfcf@gmail.com> <CADnDZ8_o8EF-b6QMqDkOAiWK-YfsNBwmrEUGy+MuXQN+21_3-w@mail.gmail.com> <CAPK2Dexb8BFC891KOVp410ia8BYUEG0AFZmEcatFLQKYj33ujg@mail.gmail.com> <CADnDZ89ZL1asxY=SPbKExvaQp-7SpXfu8KuR8uekr_aocbk-HA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADnDZ89ZL1asxY=SPbKExvaQp-7SpXfu8KuR8uekr_aocbk-HA@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong" <jaehoon.paul@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2021 10:15:25 +0900
Message-ID: <CAPK2DezrYBw1k=q9j24hnOg1AxzRcQS5ds2Z08NPS-uxubeAbg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>, its <its@ietf.org>, "Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong" <jaehoon.paul@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000092c80205cc3acad2"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/its/JJ8LAG3XpmV6cRasUBR8gSBeqfI>
Subject: Re: [ipwave] Intdir last call review of draft-ietf-ipwave-vehicular-networking-20
X-BeenThere: its@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPWAVE - IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments WG at IETF <its.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/its/>
List-Post: <mailto:its@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2021 01:16:07 -0000

Hi Abdussalam,
I tried to address the comments of Pascal Thubert as an Intdir reviewer
during the IESG last call, especially RPL.
I discussed the pros and cons of RPL for vehicular networks in the revision.

This draft is waiting for the Writeup of our AD Erik Kline for the IESG
review.

Let's see the feedback from the IESG and reflect their comments
on the draft.

Thanks.

Best Regards,
Paul


On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 6:07 AM Abdussalam Baryun <
abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Paul,
>
> Thank you for your efforts, so do you mean now it is pushed to IESG? if
> yes then ok its good news for me and the WG.
> We I don't need other work to be pushed as primarily in this WG-doc.
>
> comments below,
>
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 3:06 PM Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong <
> jaehoon.paul@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Abdussalam,
>> Thanks for your opinion.
>>
>
> good comments and suggests, I would prefer that you commented on it.
>
>
>>
>> The IPWAVE PS Draft has been made and updated by IPWAVE WG since October
>> 2016, that is, for the last 5 years.
>>
>
> yes 5 year for informational..... and I am following, so no problem we
> need to push it by replies to get it through,
>
>>
>> As the editor of this draft, I think that the coauthors as contributors
>> and I have reflected the opinions of IPWAVE WG on this draft.
>>
>
> not sure I understand your statement. I want that we progress in the
> process for all docs (it is informational draft). Therefore, I supported
> Alex's comment because reviewer has suggested some things that do not
> reflect any of this WG.
>
> Regards
> AB
>