Re: [ipwave] Commenting on the FCC plan

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Fri, 10 July 2020 15:37 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D40413A0B7D for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 08:37:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.671
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.671 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD=1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hMV0gK91Y2Eg for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 08:37:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.148]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CC983A093C for <its@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 08:37:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by cirse-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 06AFb9Gl008576; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 17:37:09 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 8C78820511C; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 17:37:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet1-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet1-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.12]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8234A2081C7; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 17:37:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.11.240.213] ([10.11.240.213]) by muguet1-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 06AFb87X013804; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 17:37:09 +0200
To: "fygsimon@gmail.com" <fygsimon@gmail.com>, Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>, its <its@ietf.org>
References: <EED81985-1D4C-41B2-8CCA-A46B96390A18@vigilsec.com> <1c70cda6-050b-e018-6786-abd99281b6bb@gmail.com> <CADnDZ8-opM3O5U7-C8v+KYTX6-ruQzajRZgDWzzZtXRnJt575Q@mail.gmail.com> <ad3ccd6c-cd99-c47a-d0df-bfb94b5ab40f@gmail.com> <CADnDZ8_wwa91-5UWeqxhJy=nMBp8kwu4ZvfxsAojZCY9DG8jSA@mail.gmail.com> <92850021-914f-ab6a-f8d2-ab793179fa1b@gmail.com> <00d601d5b4ee$01cc9ae0$0565d0a0$@eurecom.fr> <47f48fca-07b9-5657-4cb5-54cc5d63d2e3@gmail.com> <b9ea5f34-0129-614b-d644-0ab95437f6ac@gmail.com> <7664b128-91b7-8fef-1e13-b681b45b1958@gmail.com> <61f9d6f6-1e37-6e15-3a48-48e7047f0fe1@gmail.com> <CADnDZ88tsTvRdr4_jpWxnT0X_3ihTJ8=783-6M-kFNS+uMnA3Q@mail.gmail.com> <b7d40c34-ccdd-2617-0598-62a4b7faf994@gmail.com> <7f2e764a-8d75-a3a8-cd4e-a4406dd8e321@gmail.com> <038fea3b-cdd3-dbe3-04f9-fbe873661cf1@gmail.com> <0e29e730-e62a-f864-ad10-81f5e524bf33@gmail.com> <CADnDZ8-pBQC2DnFJ7gFqH_wzYd8OFyKMDk6XD2Uj533Sn1Mq-w@mail.gmail.com> <DE3E74A6-006F-447A-874B-A561E91AA27B@hxcore.ol>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <dd32ce98-6853-28e2-08af-9f3dabb2d867@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 17:37:08 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <DE3E74A6-006F-447A-874B-A561E91AA27B@hxcore.ol>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/its/MTSM3pU-GmGkwHcLVQhWEE2i7uc>
Subject: Re: [ipwave] Commenting on the FCC plan
X-BeenThere: its@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPWAVE - IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments WG at IETF <its.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/its/>
List-Post: <mailto:its@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 15:37:14 -0000

This IPv6 restriction doubt aside, has now FCC allocated 5.9GHz channels 
to non-802.11 technologies?

Le 10/07/2020 à 16:33, fygsimon@gmail.com a écrit :
> IPv6 was never restricted on the DSRC Control Channel by the FCC.  I
>  believe this was a restriction mandate by IEEE 1609.x standard(s).

I can only hope by now that IEEE 1609.x drafts do say "RFC 8691".

> The applicable US Codes of Federal Regulations are:
> 
> FCC 47 90.377 for RSU
> 
> FCC 47 95.325, 95.359, 95.3159, 95.3163, and 95.3167 which replace 
> 95.1511 since 2017.

These should say "RFC 8691" to clarify any potential confusion.

Alex

> 
> Have any questions, let me know.
> 
> Francois Simon
> 
> Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for 
> Windows 10
> 
> *From: *Abdussalam Baryun <mailto:abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> *Sent:
> *Friday, July 10, 2020 9:31 AM *To: *Alexandre Petrescu
> <mailto:alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>; its <mailto:its@ietf.org> 
> *Subject: *Re: [ipwave] Commenting on the FCC plan
> 
> thanks Alex,
> 
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 2:43 PM Alexandre Petrescu 
> <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com <mailto:alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>>
> wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I would like to know wheher FCC advanced well while seeking to
> promote innovation in the 5.9GHz band?
> 
> In particular, is now IPv6 allowed to run on the control channel 
> 5895-5905MHz on 802.11 in OCB mode?
> 
> I think it will be licensed or on demand.
> 
> The URL to the FCC document stating that seeking of promotion of 
> innovation is this, but I cant figure out a conclusion of it(?) 
> https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-seeks-promote-innovation-59-ghz-band-0
>
>  Best regards
> 
> AB
>