Re: [ipwave] FCC Moves Plan Forward to Chop Up Vehicle Safety Airwaves

[Alexandre Petrescu <[e-mail]>]

Le 17/12/2019 à 14:27, Abdussalam Baryun a écrit :
> 
> 
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 2:58 PM Alexandre Petrescu 
> <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
> 
>     in addition to wondering what it means C-V2X
>     one might wonder whether C-V2X supports IPv6 or not?
> 
> 
> yes it should support IPv6, all network in the world specially 4G 
> cellular and 5G are supporting,
> 
> 
>     also one might wonder whether FCC still considers IPv6 for vehicular
>     communications?
> 
> 
> internet services is a must now, but other services should be available 
> also,
> 
> 
>     and, if FCC keeps only the 5895-5905MHz channel, also called Control
>     Channel, for DSRC, and on which it still would like to forbid (and
>     other
>     times to not forbid) IPv6, then one wonders whether the IPv6-over-OCB
>     spec can be of any use anymore.
> 
> 
> yes it will be in use don't worry,

on which channel?

Alex

> 
> AB
> 
> 
>     Alex
> 
>     Le 17/12/2019 à 13:05, Alexandre Petrescu a écrit :
>      >
>      >
>      > Le 17/12/2019 à 12:05, Abdussalam Baryun a écrit :
>      >>
>      >>
>      >> On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 12:59 PM Alexandre Petrescu
>      >> <[e-mail]
>     <mailto:[e-mail]>
>     <mailto:[e-mail]
>     <mailto:[e-mail]>>>
>      >> wrote:
>      >>
>      >>     have people elsewhere paid money to get a license to talk in
>     the
>      >> 5.9GHz
>      >>     space?
>      >>
>      >> in the article is says the tax payers will be apposing because the
>      >> cities already used money for the  DSRC, and it mentions that
>     FCC plan
>      >> will KILL and waste a lot of money of city investment by city
>     covernment.
>      >
>      > Right, I think it is the money they spent on deploying the DSRC
>      > technology, not on spectrum.
>      >
>      > That is indeed lots of money in itself.  Even in Europe there are
>      > numerous deployments of RSUs permanently attached to poles along
>      > highways.  All these RSUs and their spectrum were created and
>     reserved
>      > by starting from USA initiatives on DSRC.
>      >
>      > I wonder what happens to all these investments in Europe if USA
>     changes
>      > tack with respect to 5.9GHz allocation to 802.11-OCB.
>      >
>      > I think there are large misunderstandings in this FCC plan.
>      >
>      > There are other ideas that were discussed privately and publicly
>     about
>      > reserving spectrum for a particular technology (spectrum should be
>      > reserved for application kind, not for a particular PHY or MAC -
>     in that
>      > sense it seems strange to refuse DSRC but allocate for C-V2X),
>     and about
>      > reserving spectrum but still free of use (how can one reserve
>     something
>      > but still allow every one to do whatever they want in it).  There
>     are
>      > many contradictions.
>      >
>      > Alex
>      >
>      >>
>      >> AB
>      >>
>      >>     (not in Europe a single person paid such money)
>      >>
>      >>     Le 17/12/2019 à 11:56, Abdussalam Baryun a écrit :
>      >>      > Hi Alex,
>      >>      >
>      >>      > I think it is still a debate and not final decision, IMO
>     it is not
>      >>      > possible change the spectrum while people are already
>     using it
>      >>     and paid
>      >>      > money for it, therefore, it is only a future plan and may
>     not be
>      >>     applied
>      >>      > in all locations in the US. Also I would like to know the
>     opinion
>      >>     of US
>      >>      > participants on this issue please.
>      >>      >
>      >>      > AB
>      >>      >
>      >>      > On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 11:59 AM Alexandre Petrescu
>      >>      > <[e-mail]
>     <mailto:[e-mail]>
>      >>     <mailto:[e-mail]
>     <mailto:[e-mail]>>
>      >>     <mailto:[e-mail]
>     <mailto:[e-mail]>
>      >>     <mailto:[e-mail]
>     <mailto:[e-mail]>>>> wrote:
>      >>      >
>      >>      >
>      >>      >
>      >>      >     Le 17/12/2019 à 01:01, Russ Housley a écrit :
>      >>      >      >
>      >>      >
>      >>
>      >>
>     https://www.consumerreports.org/car-safety/fcc-moves-plan-forward-to-chop-up-vehicle-safety-airwaves/
> 
>      >>
>      >>      >     [...]
>      >>      >      > The FCC plan would divide 75 MHz of the safety
>     spectrum
>      >>     between WiFi
>      >>      >      > and auto safety applications. The FCC proposal
>     allocates
>      >>     20 MHz for a
>      >>      >      > newer V2X technology, known as C-V2X, and leaves
>     10 MHz
>      >>     for either
>      >>      >      > C-V2X or DSRC.
>      >>      >
>      >>      >
>      >>      > AB> they will need to deliver the technology and
>     implement it,
>      >>      >
>      >>      > It is indeed a plan that invites to think about the future.
>      >>      >
>      >>      > An implementation of IPv6 over OCB that uses a 20MHz channel,
>      >>     instead of
>      >>      > 10MHz, would no longer be 'illegal'.
>      >>      >
>      >>      > I would like to ask whether FCC considers this potential
>     C-V2X
>      >> 20MHz
>      >>      > channel to still be free of use for everyone (like the
>     current
>      >> 5.9GHz
>      >>      > band) or will it be licensed and paid for? (like e.g. the
>     2.6 GHz
>      >>     band
>      >>      > of LTE).
>      >>      >
>      >>      > AB> I think it should be like WiFi usedby all free,
>      >>      >
>      >>      > Alex
>      >>      >
>      >>      >
>      >>      >
>      >>      >  > _______________________________________________
>      >>      >  > its mailing list
>      >>      >  > [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
>     <mailto:[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>> <mailto:[e-mail]
>     <mailto:[e-mail]>
>      >>     <mailto:[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>>
>      >>      >  > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its
>      >>      >  >
>      >>      >
>      >>      > _______________________________________________
>      >>      > its mailing list
>      >>      > [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> <mailto:[e-mail]
>     <mailto:[e-mail]>> <mailto:[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
>      >>     <mailto:[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>>
>      >>      > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its
>      >>
>      >
>      > _______________________________________________
>      > its mailing list
>      > [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
>      > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     its mailing list
>     [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its
>