IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ipwave] [Int-dir] side note RFC 4291 2nd par sec. 2.1 LL on loopback

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Wed, 17 April 2019 14:34 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DA6D120186; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 07:34:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.633
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.633 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GPfXF4y-OWQ8; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 07:34:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B277612014E; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 07:33:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by sainfoin-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id x3HEXr4c035494; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 16:33:53 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id C599D205DD6; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 16:33:53 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.13]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE3FF205E14; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 16:33:53 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.8.35.150] (is154594.intra.cea.fr [10.8.35.150]) by muguet2-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id x3HEXrw0022964; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 16:33:53 +0200
To: 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp>
Cc: Pascal Thubert <pthubert@cisco.com>, "<int-dir@ietf.org>" <int-dir@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb.all@ietf.org, its@ietf.org, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <155169869045.5118.3508360720339540639@ietfa.amsl.com> <bcb6d12d-5b21-1f10-1afe-221321f8e7a6@gmail.com> <CAJE_bqd5t77B5ij3ot-F-ucx5+3A7LATC-VTBx3w2_kCDD8fNA@mail.gmail.com> <35193c42-44ec-7337-56e6-84df6053843e@gmail.com> <CAJE_bqdkhNFLg9ZT3uSFmjd-+5J78nQTQ8wKDHE8fe2v9Zn8Rg@mail.gmail.com> <35eeeddc-e861-d357-1468-dd853c53ea4d@gmail.com> <CAJE_bqfDPom7+LunUD7XtmcE4kxFFBOcFVe+BgFNejdQNqDn=Q@mail.gmail.com> <973eaac2-9fe7-f438-c0e4-2eeafeec6087@gmail.com> <CAJE_bqeA4xgfWmDQoMNDy86G+5g5HN2-XxHtHdong6Zn1DQ2rA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <bad0ddda-444f-460c-64f9-97d32376fef9@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 16:33:53 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAJE_bqeA4xgfWmDQoMNDy86G+5g5HN2-XxHtHdong6Zn1DQ2rA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/its/OcuGp4BUXLpWvztKxLs9KiY8wrY>
Subject: Re: [ipwave] [Int-dir] side note RFC 4291 2nd par sec. 2.1 LL on loopback
X-BeenThere: its@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPWAVE - IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments WG at IETF <its.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/its/>
List-Post: <mailto:its@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 14:34:07 -0000


Le 17/04/2019 à 16:27, 神明達哉 a écrit :
> At Wed, 17 Apr 2019 09:56:39 +0200,
> Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com 
> <mailto:alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>  > [...]> Note also that MacOS is derived from BSD in case you don't
>  > > remember/know it.  And, in fact it also generates both "fe80::1" and
>  > > "::1" on the "lo0" interface.
>  >
>  > Right, I forgot that.
>  >
>  > But there is something I never knew for sure.
>  >
>  > Are BSD flavors supporting OCB options?
> 
> I don't know, but I don't think it matters here anyway:

Maybe it matters, maybe it does not matter.

If BSD does not support OCB, why should we write an IP-over-OCB spec 
along the lines of BSD which does not accept fe80:1::1 in the first place?

Were BSD to support OCB then indeed we would be reluctant in writing a 
spec which outlaws fe80:1::1.

Alex

  this particular
> sub-thread is already an off-topic for draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb.
> 
> --
> JINMEI, Tatuya

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email