Re: [ipwave] FCC Moves Plan Forward to Chop Up Vehicle Safety Airwaves

[Abdussalam Baryun <[e-mail]>]

V2X and V2V communications had two design proposals:

1- using WLAN technology
2- using Cellular network technology

So we worked on the first in this WG.

On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 12:58 PM Alexandre Petrescu <
[e-mail]> wrote:

> > https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-361339A1.pdf
>
> > For Immediate Release FCC SEEKS TO PROMOTE INNOVATION IN THE 5.9 GHZ
> > BAND WASHINGTON, December 12, 2019—The Federal Communications
> > Commission today voted[...]
>
> What does C in C-V2X mean?  Is it Cellular V2X like in 3GPP?  I assume
> this is what is meant by C-V2X: point-to-point links from 3GPP.
>
> Yes, there are 4G and 5G


> Or is C-V2X something more like BSM messages put on 802.11 kind of link
> (be it OCB or more traditional WiFi)?
>

no it is cellular network communication  technologies/protocols

>
> What does C-V2X mean entirely?  Is it sending BSM messages or is it also
> sending CAM messages (in 3GPP there are only CAM messages AFAIremember).
>
> What are the implementations of C-V2X  and on which hardware from which
> manufacturer?
>

see our draft mentions c-v2x:

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ipwave-vehicular-networking-03#page-19


I think it is important that we do more work for the C-V2X section in the
draft as well.


> Detailing this term is key to understand the plan and to be able to
> answer the consultation.  It might be very worrisome as well as it might
> be nothing new but a change in terms.
>

The C-V2X is challenging with WiFi V2X, it depends on what is mostly used
by countries, but the WiFi is probably will win.

AB

>
>