Re: [ipwave] Roman Danyliw's Abstain on draft-ietf-ipwave-vehicular-networking-30: (with COMMENT)

"Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong" <jaehoon.paul@gmail.com> Wed, 09 November 2022 08:49 UTC

Return-Path: <jaehoon.paul@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1BF6C1522AD; Wed, 9 Nov 2022 00:49:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.093
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.093 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_HK_NAME_FM_MR_MRS=0.01, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MUt3rpFK0mfj; Wed, 9 Nov 2022 00:49:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pl1-x633.google.com (mail-pl1-x633.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::633]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FB32C14F692; Wed, 9 Nov 2022 00:49:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pl1-x633.google.com with SMTP id j12so16482453plj.5; Wed, 09 Nov 2022 00:49:56 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=U8c5sO7dxGmN0S6PpsQjfnNApy4w3XPsXEiKgGla5Jo=; b=msn1/ZQ88vHNoYFVfnhCXVLCwn0KMV/xMVPRLwHwn6h0XINRFfGuBCF5NbHDXdEGNZ P9YDnSpcv4Rw6tb13GX/sx0kOw8CfhdH7cGEtBwo9KMLIglZTYccia8vvyuH/CKYnyWA uwNfLjc2CiLNNBecI7Faql/ioHZH3rvaE9kkS0gTbLwO5GZWbUoT4sb3hJbtR82LiPZL qAfNUFMPHrOFuI4v38g9gSbM3xw/dEQ+gH3XW55oxhG4RAg/MU8MNqb6xyyNfm/XXK+T xpmrGXXXpAC2VCcZIMhJ0nxhmBSRtu4SdMuhapjbzAz7gotwtX5aZCWYyI9P2bAjL655 MNJQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=U8c5sO7dxGmN0S6PpsQjfnNApy4w3XPsXEiKgGla5Jo=; b=p60hapRHvEzFaa/HkJx5KxRUf1CgDGcWkPS14Y3JMz+XXxo2rEBsPwPGonluuGZ1RB kIRO+U3l9nfz2G7GxvUfvERVstVl8MuohXcmuJrcRokC+EWAe51JuiVAVNPrRJYyaVrF MXfBcnrFRYRfQM7oqCpisEbd7//Vms5pmFT8bjf3s4OaKoprwQeO//iZOnlASmSGyCE0 3s+sQb945atKVriFBszU3F2YJwXCrXDPNFHfomXsNS+vuWzi4+1MFOqiMDhiNAfmuR/y B8GneIFCDpDUhNjROkf//n3AWpGW2KkNNMuNhNN7nxIGVYtY3S8ZZi4ttoaXlPDCcfqi kMcw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf3hV9+QItnpxeIQJTugqsZZh9qflO1zI1x37u3DuOXDj2IYDfWO SCGXV5nMC+bytTmzdafZdD8hRnqi0ZQt81aPnR8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM549KcMzF4ZUosPHZOl5NG4tlm3aDQ17BkvjK8LcbxuUnicp6W4hFMI/CfPFDuWCx4BnVXgWeor24f0dE/GJFY=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:8a90:b0:186:b145:f5ec with SMTP id p16-20020a1709028a9000b00186b145f5ecmr61050406plo.103.1667983795157; Wed, 09 Nov 2022 00:49:55 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <166742897276.25784.14497820286897218098@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAPK2DexET58qdOH9iTVPeJqhYrO+F-4Y5GoJ1f+FWggKZTD_VQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPK2DexET58qdOH9iTVPeJqhYrO+F-4Y5GoJ1f+FWggKZTD_VQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong" <jaehoon.paul@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2022 08:49:17 +0000
Message-ID: <CAPK2Dewx2r36rOqO-h-_2wVscp26pgn+meG02tSK65eJmnNtTQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, its@ietf.org, Carlos Bernardos <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, skku-iotlab-members <skku-iotlab-members@googlegroups.com>, "Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong" <jaehoon.paul@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000099ff6d05ed05bdbd"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/its/UynPvIXh7Uxy4skUQGg7Pq6GrxM>
Subject: Re: [ipwave] Roman Danyliw's Abstain on draft-ietf-ipwave-vehicular-networking-30: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: its@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPWAVE - IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments WG at IETF <its.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/its/>
List-Post: <mailto:its@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2022 08:50:00 -0000

Hi Erik,
Are you going to approve this IPWAVE PS Draft as an Informational RFC this
week?

If I do something more about this draft, please let me know.

Thanks.

Best Regards,
Paul

On Thu, Nov 3, 2022 at 1:39 AM Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong <
jaehoon.paul@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Roman,
> Thanks for your review and comments.
>
> Erik,
> I think you can let this IPWAVE PS draft move forward as IESG approval.
>
> IESG members,
> Thanks for your help to improve this draft.
>
> Best Regards,
> Paul
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2022 at 7:42 AM Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <
> noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
>
>> Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
>> draft-ietf-ipwave-vehicular-networking-30: Abstain
>>
>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
>> introductory paragraph, however.)
>>
>>
>> Please refer to
>> https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/
>> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>>
>>
>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ipwave-vehicular-networking/
>>
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> COMMENT:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Thank you to Daniel Migault for the SECDIR review.
>>
>> Thank you for making edits in response to my DISCUSS positions.  Despite
>> these
>> changes, it is my assessment that the security and privacy properties are
>> not
>> sufficiently described given the wide array of enabling technologies cited
>> (e.g., credit-based authorization models, blockchain based authentication
>> and
>> logging, in vehicle credit card transactions).  Furthermore, the document
>> references architectural elements such as “legal vehicles” and “legal …
>> smartphones”; and threats such as “privacy breakage” without sufficient
>> explanation.
>>
>> For the reasons above and a few noted by Rob Wilton in his ballot, I am
>> abstaining on this document.  The IESG DISCUSS criteria
>> (
>> https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/iesg-discuss-criteria/#stand-disc
>> )
>> is not applicable to my above concerns since no protocol is being
>> described and
>> the guidance presented here is not intended to be implemented without
>> significant further design and specification.
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> its mailing list
>> its@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its
>>
>