Re: [ipwave] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-47: (with COMMENT)
Nabil Benamar <n.benamar@est.umi.ac.ma> Fri, 05 July 2019 15:01 UTC
Return-Path: <n.benamar@est.umi.ac.ma>
X-Original-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4A73120098 for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Jul 2019 08:01:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=est-umi-ac-ma.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PZk0kbasw5hd for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Jul 2019 08:01:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2a.google.com (mail-io1-xd2a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39F6A120086 for <its@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Jul 2019 08:01:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2a.google.com with SMTP id f4so4219583ioh.6 for <its@ietf.org>; Fri, 05 Jul 2019 08:01:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=est-umi-ac-ma.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=zcZn6mlqpyar5gm7Xq78zdd6qP8N4xH6w7+s61V9dq8=; b=bUtZ1x+rUgDKkr0APGdX8AfzX9/xaw6DWuqewrBKbIQE8bciYPaib29RCf2L8ZQqyE wdP6ygNzXrJ6RPrwAWpj21SsjJSH54Q4ZezZ4bPgCv1HP2V16TcYSGKf0qk8gId6YLPw WZUzd6NIpOqBNVkxVvqSfQjg1N2DGYfcwTDXjJ/Ft+YOPY+UtNxVdjm2tblc+3Ir8MMs XkphdWvXQXk+xtj1lIPkyLLZlViirjzT6WPvFXZYtLzBdr+DQrGEB53DITJtnGVmIWT7 3tjp7rWfhN//zIuOTwPp1JB5MEVr1FVTJu+dAoO051/KWgjKmPTCJaXjnsruJgyUClPv n+gg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=zcZn6mlqpyar5gm7Xq78zdd6qP8N4xH6w7+s61V9dq8=; b=G/UukiAfJcZSiWrTkx5D4KSSOmy+45HHdXoLFK7TNRey8pwMrZ4j1bPZyAz9PNagf6 6WVdhY6DTRx6dQO4t7d3sCrmRnuCOFhAIK8mnNTT19kU7vTIwk0kNcj3AiFPEV4/GT/v bePaLPo/dYGIN3o8xo95vPGix2J6YtyRA3FYXl4njTJ1VXdAjCHqtavUOiPNFvnQGhr8 g6e2O88Yy9RQNPecnduMU9GBiITwnvRdbY3e3u6MIPfmPibuxznLuyFPw2fbeaGdgD19 OLWO+YmqhQaC7Pecpp6V4cN46cviMoMIE5H7OgWlLA8QmLMqhVjpssd+3CvIzAL2yZ+O WprQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVKRqZCGul6RPakzazwfSQ/YDH6mGp/vfQcqsxrnVrFDzUQs8/Q zN7I9StcUpvdKBNCt45lVGr4Ooz0ZGikNfh1l582Sg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy/jMq3jNPOddRWFKRBAYIu1ITyfi7d2Qstbg5wCqe0PMq/1S4tJ1jtzwfGRZTuiBCDDiv+1P+R4RPAp5GlKj4=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:149:: with SMTP id y9mr5230083jao.76.1562338890449; Fri, 05 Jul 2019 08:01:30 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <156233354131.21666.17046552907026625981.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <156233354131.21666.17046552907026625981.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Nabil Benamar <n.benamar@est.umi.ac.ma>
Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2019 16:01:19 +0100
Message-ID: <CAD8vqFcNdgki0L4cDdxC=kpt1wsJY+9FrJbtJXfk3Jmey573Gw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb@ietf.org, Carlos Bernardos <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>, ipwave-chairs@ietf.org, its@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000095bfaf058cf05eed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/its/V46_97RrzrAF3rmj76PKWxYQwls>
Subject: Re: [ipwave] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-47: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: its@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPWAVE - IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments WG at IETF <its.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/its/>
List-Post: <mailto:its@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2019 15:01:34 -0000
Dear Alvaro, Thank you for your review. Much appreciated! > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > §4.3: I think that the MAYs used in this section are out of place as they > only > state facts and not Normative behavior. s/MAY/may > Shall we replace them by 'can' ? > > §4.5.2: "Future improvement to this specification SHOULD consider > solutions for > these problems." I understand the interest to consider the problems...but > I > don't think there's any Normative action that results from using SHOULD. > s/SHOULD/should > I agree. There is no specific Normative action, but MAY or MUST do not make sens in this context! Thanks again for your comments. -- Best Regards Nabil Benamar Associate Professor Department of Computer Sciences School of Technology Moulay Ismail University Meknes. Morocco
- [ipwave] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ie… Alvaro Retana via Datatracker
- Re: [ipwave] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draf… Nabil Benamar
- Re: [ipwave] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draf… Alvaro Retana
- Re: [ipwave] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draf… Nabil Benamar