Re: [ipwave] ND-over-OCB hidden terminals: truck obstructing direct car-to-car and asphalt reflections

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Tue, 16 April 2019 13:59 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C46E612040A; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 06:59:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.631
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.631 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_06=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wr1ROPdDaLDa; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 06:59:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.148]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CEFF1200F4; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 06:59:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by cirse-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id x3GDxLqJ017905; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 15:59:21 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 8FBFE201788; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 15:59:21 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.13]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91FDD200C5C; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 15:59:20 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.8.35.150] (is154594.intra.cea.fr [10.8.35.150]) by muguet2-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id x3GDxJBR010116; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 15:59:19 +0200
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, NABIL BENAMAR <n.benamar@est.umi.ac.ma>, "Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" <sgundave@cisco.com>
Cc: nabil benamar <benamar73@gmail.com>, "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "its@ietf.org" <its@ietf.org>, "int-dir@ietf.org" <int-dir@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb.all@ietf.org>
References: <155169869045.5118.3508360720339540639@ietfa.amsl.com> <a8aad636-069c-4451-dbf1-72c1db2204ef@gmail.com> <CAD8vqFfx_FVi5NobrR1p6xEKjkSNa1_ZejgrEs3JPDHJQoxD7A@mail.gmail.com> <MN2PR11MB356570FDBC5798F155DDEE25D82C0@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CAMugd_Xce5cWLtVB4DbR1ZEaFbdfiRpXre9oq61ukRC+n+3cZw@mail.gmail.com> <D8D5F0B7.2F2BB8%sgundave@cisco.com> <D8D5F510.2F2BC8%sgundave@cisco.com> <3e716b4b-8236-0488-309c-7cd3a54db7b5@gmail.com> <D8D7B1E7.2F2CA2%sgundave@cisco.com> <CAD8vqFfSGKhw_ou3VB98C8r1gq=4WD8+f8C5P53C46k-0V+XuA@mail.gmail.com> <66e7c810-45a5-5244-59dc-4b764b6fb346@gmail.com> <1a6599ee-88f9-42d9-a208-918ba6711612@gmail.com> <11645738-6f95-82e5-48f1-ebc3ce54423e@gmail.com> <0ae10089-4b1a-f85c-1a3d-15e712cb7547@gmail.com> <084449fd-2693-0cfb-6589-0cf67cf9ffe6@gmail.com>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <0db9c369-03c5-e31c-010e-8fb275555c50@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 15:59:19 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <084449fd-2693-0cfb-6589-0cf67cf9ffe6@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------C73499D11D8327AD76F8DE79"
Content-Language: fr
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/its/WXPmpuA6Du4suPvq7kGsbm1-bn0>
Subject: Re: [ipwave] ND-over-OCB hidden terminals: truck obstructing direct car-to-car and asphalt reflections
X-BeenThere: its@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPWAVE - IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments WG at IETF <its.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/its/>
List-Post: <mailto:its@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 13:59:53 -0000

Le 15/04/2019 à 23:04, Brian E Carpenter a écrit :> Excuse top posting.
 >
 > As I've said, I am no expert, but I do know some physics, and it
 > seems pretty clear to me that if there are multiple lanes of traffic,
 > a large truck can easily shield signals between two cars and the
 > shielding will be intermittent, regardless of how much wireless power
 > is allowed, depending on traffic movement. So it's a highly dynamic
 > mesh network.

Well I agree with your intuitive description of the truck-between-cars 
situation. But I dont agree to call it highly dynamic mesh network, for 
any definition of this latter; there is very little dynamicity in it.  I 
dont agree to tell it has problems with ND, because I experimented it 
and it works[*]

Alex


---------------------------

[*] I can explain why. This explanation comes from practice with OCB and 
with radars/lidars with cars on road.

The intuitive description that you make is that of a blocking of signal 
by a solid separator object:

                  ----------
                 |          |
     -------     |  Truck   |    -------
    |  Car  |    |          |   |  Car  |
     -O---O-      -O-O-----O-    -O---O-
---------------------------------------------- asphalt

In this illustration, it may be difficult for Cars to talk to each other 
on OCB, because of that Truck in the middle.

But when trying it on road, we realized  the Cars do talk ok to each 
other on OCB, even if there are these solid objects separators.  (worse, 
even the radars can see each other, some times, as if the Truck was 
absent.  Note that the effect of radar or camera that sees below a truck 
is reocgnized as the main cause of a known Tesla accident, among others.)

Some expert view explained this by waves reflected by below the Truck 
(asphalt).  I heard it verbatim from a partner.

These two sequences of photos illustrate such behaviour with OCB on the 
road.  The sequences are available on the web at 
https://youtu.be/F-_4Wmyzh2c?t=161

This is not the first such experiment to 'see thru' vehicles.  Other 
organisations did it before.  The ones that I know of are Samsung and a 
University in Spain.

In the first sequence we see how two cars between two other cars dont 
obstruct the IP-over-OCB propagation of a video stream between the first 
and rearmost vehicles.

In the second sequence we see how a big truck between two cars doesnt 
obstruct the IP-over-OCB propagation of such a video stream.

1st sequence:

The photo below shows the screen in one car that contains the video 
streamed from the front car with IPv6 on OCB.  The two cars are 
immediately following each other on highway:
https://youtu.be/F-_4Wmyzh2c?t=168



In the photo below we see the front car immediately in front of this car

https://youtu.be/F-_4Wmyzh2c?t=178


In the photo below we see an intermediary small car (white) getting in 
the middle.  The streaming continues, as if the intermediary car was not 
obstructing the OCB.


In the photo below we see a 2nd intermediary small car (still white) 
that gets in the middle.  The streaming continues (at least the human 
filmer did not see a change, because it may have happened too fast).


2nd sequence:

In the photo below we see the 1st car getting further and a truck 
approaching to insert between the two:

In the photo below we see the truck obstructing the view:


In the photo below we see the video displayed in this car, that is 
streamed on IPv6-over-OCB and that does get through: