IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ipwave] Intdir early review of draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-34

CARLOS JESUS BERNARDOS CANO <cjbc@it.uc3m.es> Mon, 08 April 2019 19:14 UTC

Return-Path: <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
X-Original-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD0CC12032F for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 12:14:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=it.uc3m.es
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tMU0Ty3smZ1j for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 12:14:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x431.google.com (mail-wr1-x431.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::431]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FE60120020 for <its@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 12:14:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x431.google.com with SMTP id j9so17745522wrn.6 for <its@ietf.org>; Mon, 08 Apr 2019 12:14:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=it.uc3m.es; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=a0fdBohcGc8mnso+HGlwarBCT6YgSWnVXKhbjBINawA=; b=oKJRGBFFZYSEcdPI8V0HxDEvR+aVG+c9aSLjLZVj5IL3qZjG9AcLxUmxoXaN571WOr Q9lmGuI9OHAT3eYAWi428vq/8S6YHvsXrjuSbSk3iEeB7fcNy6OhoETHcc5Ent7LV+3I 7LPBH6MC70n/FE78ebrhJJMJIscpRk1ncKDAI2NNwkdu+Oy0/UXzx2W0Z9Wl3SpR/nr2 3zU/SxK7NRJrr5WslLtBjJF1cbLspNm14d37D9p3SQgMStmh8/dVkQ3OcgXLwVOjygzf vuFPcQsJuwD1cEOT1ryMqEaXnpgiFOpnHYDEBKyWG+MUXzsLPkiIEmXVjeBy9OKtZay1 lU3A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=a0fdBohcGc8mnso+HGlwarBCT6YgSWnVXKhbjBINawA=; b=bpRlmG9F0XUFNWDXASTyLnbMQuyp8eJf9rBcZajahygryTcBFjniHlu4jVOoUBtflg gLW63nOO6zHJer7AHZSplMo9iOM7h6Q8MygF2FOJtdYLXgl+8mzkurM01I4VCkvU+o1e 8eCjSY+qRt+pgz8Bve7P0ayLHOyXhXmgDdZY1XbSEm783GYsiP6akZQm23GUnP2GsK4I x2cOZAynvi0VgGVrHPeuuJtpwyiXgf/DZzsaF2/Pxmj3hqdDNUOIdWcPROMfFp5tkzBq Rcb331QVgzis+/xPeZB0RhaUmENKSXeHhZE3c40Dc3Zsxh/Qd1Fq48pHSr1EtdyisbRP F9nA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX5y3gaUn3MkZ4jVl9PjJOvHqFV9nRAHFB0Ipd9oqZhhCQBclKP MZkjkrGKqjixFtJ+FFGmkGshK7BuUBg1JumWyYB0sQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzrP2x356pdow+hf393Acixu92fZqoqpPrTSgB45KJc286TtpVaIi4v/nSjFhzqdzd0RluR4S6skkHiyVFA/zg=
X-Received: by 2002:adf:ee07:: with SMTP id y7mr18566771wrn.219.1554750840628; Mon, 08 Apr 2019 12:14:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <155169869045.5118.3508360720339540639@ietfa.amsl.com> <9d5c8168-a915-358e-d7eb-0362cad96d81@gmail.com> <27AE185B-1D95-4DCD-8C76-AECE90E46802@cisco.com> <MN2PR11MB35651C4D8957516CF034BFADD8510@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CALypLp9SuURGJ4f8FBzZg1WQOo9B4xsB8Y4uGW+Jtfm2b=8Sww@mail.gmail.com> <92507EE2-4336-49B3-B9C5-85EB8A8E60CD@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <92507EE2-4336-49B3-B9C5-85EB8A8E60CD@tzi.org>
From: CARLOS JESUS BERNARDOS CANO <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2019 21:13:44 +0200
Message-ID: <CALypLp_KaUqi5Xha8vKZ1UVKymb8iqFOFOyqzjp_tru0ZBpgEA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Cc: Pascal Thubert <pthubert@cisco.com>, "Stanley, Dorothy" <dorothy.stanley@hpe.com>, "int-ads@tools.ietf.org" <int-ads@tools.ietf.org>, Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>, "its@ietf.org" <its@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000920ece058609a3a6"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/its/X7kXXCQVPQO-Xj438S019lQ8jO8>
Subject: Re: [ipwave] Intdir early review of draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-34
X-BeenThere: its@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPWAVE - IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments WG at IETF <its.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/its/>
List-Post: <mailto:its@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2019 19:14:05 -0000

Hi Carsten,

On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 9:08 PM Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:

> On Apr 8, 2019, at 21:03, CARLOS JESUS BERNARDOS CANO <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
> wrote:
> >
> > - I tend to agree with Alex in that I’d skip the RECOMMENDED part of the
> text (referring to RFC 8505).
>
> What would that even mean?
>
> If I come up as an OCB node, how do I know if I should act as an
> ND-classic node or as an efficient-ND (RFC 6775/8505, whatever) node?
> RECOMMENDED does not cut it here.  The IP-over-foo document needs to tell
> me.
>

The IP-over-foo is telling you to act as an ND-classic node, as we have not
yet discussed on efficient/enhanced-ND operation over OCB.

Thanks,

Carlos

>
> Grüße, Carsten
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email