IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ipwave] About OCB patch for ath10k driver on linux

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Fri, 22 May 2020 16:23 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 950CE3A0C59 for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 May 2020 09:23:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zHYXK5gwfLCA for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 May 2020 09:23:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [193.110.157.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D817A3A0C30 for <its@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 May 2020 09:23:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49TBc651W0zG4L; Fri, 22 May 2020 18:23:02 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1590164582; bh=Vj/VJOP/dvia32sF+uSl2lDelk/FxdlHcyEeK+ZPshw=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=pH5JHCRhwiPAC7X0j+AF4tNfmEZIQ/mMDokJjommJEbp4q9k3WRWh4n4Vwa7j00Ro B/NZ9mIVq5usta2H/tI7PvAuVKhUZrXK01PMxVLc8qAk60vCrRGs6On/gjXudXj4lq ujvrIZk04ZTuem2k0ZGQx/TVmcKMxIC1At0D2XG8=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N4cFRqwGdUqS; Fri, 22 May 2020 18:23:01 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [76.10.157.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Fri, 22 May 2020 18:23:01 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 339E76020EFF; Fri, 22 May 2020 12:23:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FE8766B7C; Fri, 22 May 2020 12:23:00 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 12:22:59 -0400
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
cc: its@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <335eb5d5-ab59-a6b4-891f-18b611b8887f@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.21.2005221221310.3507@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <e8a25961-5ac9-d35e-77dd-bf86f45cd077@gmail.com> <fb4d8076-11db-d130-898e-036f5a6df0d7@gmail.com> <6221eb05-8466-f811-703a-d86e9e1032c1@gmail.com> <71f6b707-b21d-be40-e5c5-57b0d9b2e7b7@gmail.com> <335eb5d5-ab59-a6b4-891f-18b611b8887f@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/its/YY_3iTyUxIYyrWct8edectvyMy0>
Subject: Re: [ipwave] About OCB patch for ath10k driver on linux
X-BeenThere: its@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPWAVE - IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments WG at IETF <its.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/its/>
List-Post: <mailto:its@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 16:23:08 -0000

On Fri, 22 May 2020, Alexandre Petrescu wrote:

> There is news from Potsdam about an 802.11p (aka OCB mode) patch for an 
> ath10k driver, probably for a Mikrotik R11 kind of card.
>
> https://gitlab.com/hpi-potsdam/osm/g5-on-linux/11p-on-linux/-/tree/ath10k

Did the license issues regarding the use of OCB outside of TLS RFC's get
resolved?

Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email