Re: [ipwave] Intdir early review of draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-34 - title of the section 4.3 on LLs

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Mon, 08 April 2019 09:44 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B9FB1200B8; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 02:44:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.633
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.633 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x05eZ9De62Op; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 02:44:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oxalide-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (oxalide-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.168.224.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C81D612006D; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 02:44:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by oxalide-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id x389ibie172249; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 11:44:38 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id CD5B0203AFC; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 11:44:37 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet1-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet1-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.12]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id B52CF200E0C; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 11:44:37 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.8.35.150] (is154594.intra.cea.fr [10.8.35.150]) by muguet1-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id x389ibfJ030816; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 11:44:37 +0200
To: Pascal Thubert <pthubert@cisco.com>
Cc: int-dir@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, its@ietf.org, draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb.all@ietf.org
References: <155169869045.5118.3508360720339540639@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5b3f940b-9492-b65f-c772-01e3cc09d1bd@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2019 11:44:37 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <155169869045.5118.3508360720339540639@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/its/aRrZUQNZm78AQBV6tEYMbURXuJo>
Subject: Re: [ipwave] Intdir early review of draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-34 - title of the section 4.3 on LLs
X-BeenThere: its@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPWAVE - IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments WG at IETF <its.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/its/>
List-Post: <mailto:its@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2019 09:44:44 -0000

Le 04/03/2019 à 12:24, Pascal Thubert a écrit :
> Reviewer: Pascal Thubert Review result: Not Ready
[...]
> " Among these types of addresses only the IPv6 link-local addresses 
> MAY be formed using an EUI-64 identifier. "
> 
> This text should not be in a LL specific section since it deals with
> the other addresses. Maybe rename the section to "addressing" or
> something?

The titles of these sections come directly from the RFC2464 
IPv6-over-Ethernet.

The title of this section is 'Link-Local Addresses' and as such it has 
the Address root in it.

The text deals indeed with other kinds of addresses, in that it says 
'There are several types of IPv6 addresses'.  But then it gets specific 
to LL addresses.  The 'MAY' keyword is only applied to LL addresses.

As such, I do not understand why do you think it deals with the other 
kinds of addresses (non LL)?

Alex