IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ipwave] RSU minor textual issue

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Mon, 29 May 2017 15:54 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11E8A129ACC for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 May 2017 08:54:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.367
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.367 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3WQ9NtqcI5ZQ for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 May 2017 08:54:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oxalide-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (oxalide-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.168.224.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 896BE129AC6 for <its@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 May 2017 08:54:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by oxalide-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id v4TFsTEd056690; Mon, 29 May 2017 17:54:29 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 76025205791; Mon, 29 May 2017 17:54:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet1.intra.cea.fr (muguet1.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.6]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D27320574A; Mon, 29 May 2017 17:54:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [132.166.84.45] ([132.166.84.45]) by muguet1.intra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.4) with ESMTP id v4TFsS4k027402; Mon, 29 May 2017 17:54:28 +0200
To: Rex Buddenberg <buddenbergr@gmail.com>, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
References: <b7d0f246-da90-ac56-db69-40e9e929900d@gmail.com> <3916AFEC-80E9-469F-A2D7-F66010AAB23C@vigilsec.com> <1495131116.2400.9.camel@gmail.com>
Cc: "its@ietf.org" <its@ietf.org>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <785b7136-17b1-0915-e860-b67fbfbc427b@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 18:54:27 +0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1495131116.2400.9.camel@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/its/dIreFG_-0MAHbFL6S3RkeBgPzq8>
Subject: Re: [ipwave] RSU minor textual issue
X-BeenThere: its@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPWAVE - IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments WG at IETF <its.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/its/>
List-Post: <mailto:its@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 15:54:34 -0000

Rex,

Le 18/05/2017 à 20:11, Rex Buddenberg a écrit :
[...]
> Suggestion.  Would a standards-track RFC titled 'Requirements for
> Road Side Units' make sense?  Not unlike the old RFC1812

I think it can make sense to have a separate document listing the 
requirements for Road-Sode Units.

I agree with you that some characteristics of IP RSUs are:
- there is huge difference between the radio interfaces and the wired
   interfaces situated on an RSU;
- some RSUs may provide Internet service like DNS, and other IP
   presence indication like RA or DHCP.
- some RSUs may provide application-layer services like POI broadcast,
   or charge spot information, or time info.
- some RSUs may connect to the Internet at large.

Alex

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email