Re: [ipwave] 5G deployment status

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Thu, 17 October 2019 10:58 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2A69120866 for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 03:58:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.632
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.632 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KEmi2bBSFm4L for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 03:58:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.148]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4898C12085A for <its@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 03:58:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by cirse-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id x9HAwSAG012898; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 12:58:28 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id AA4ED203FAF; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 12:58:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.13]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BF4C203F11; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 12:58:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.8.35.150] (is154594.intra.cea.fr [10.8.35.150]) by muguet2-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id x9HAwSeP005895; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 12:58:28 +0200
To: andre@softwareradiosystems.com
Cc: its@ietf.org
References: <195f97b7-107b-e8e4-a255-142e79b02465@softwareradiosystems.com> <ecc2328e-138a-dc4d-9fc4-cc628fa08561@gmail.com> <cc7f16f7-e227-fda6-2236-549bee172511@softwareradiosystems.com> <7d0a69c3-7d3d-db40-a7ef-c57982b88fd3@gmail.com> <c0976e08-c101-4b60-f601-e85ebbfd89f5@softwareradiosystems.com>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <685c6800-53fb-dd2e-8615-bdd6233bc9a3@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 12:58:28 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <c0976e08-c101-4b60-f601-e85ebbfd89f5@softwareradiosystems.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/its/dYXtQgVsMq4MQW8MHpJWWvJgVwI>
Subject: Re: [ipwave] 5G deployment status
X-BeenThere: its@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPWAVE - IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments WG at IETF <its.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/its/>
List-Post: <mailto:its@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 10:58:32 -0000


Le 17/10/2019 à 12:20, Andre Puschmann a écrit :
> Hi,
> 
> On 17/10/19 12:00, Alexandre Petrescu wrote:
>> So, I am asking you whether srsUE would send CAM messages like which of
>> the options below?
>>
>> CAM               CAM           CAM
>> ---               ---           ---
>> BTP               IP            PDCP
>> ---               ---           ---
>> GeoNetworking     PDCP          OFDM
>> ---               ---
>> PDCP              OFDM
>> ---
>> OFDM
>>
> 
> srsUE will be able to carry all of the defined/supported formats. Have a
> look at the PDCP specs for more details.

I will look at the PDCP specs for details.

Do  you know  whether

CAM
---
IP
--
PDCP
----

is a supported format?

Alex
> 
> Best
> Andre
>