Re: [ipwave] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-46

[Alexandre Petrescu <[e-mail]>]

I would like to ask for comparison to implementation too.

I dont want my implementation to become non-standard because it does not 
change its MAC address all the time.

Le 17/06/2019 à 15:25, Roni Even (A) a écrit :
> Thanks,
> 
> The only comment left is:
> 
> 
> 2. In section 5.2 "The policy dictating when the MAC address is changed 
> on the
> 802.11-OCB interface is to-be-determined.". Reading the next sentence it 
> looks
> to me that this is needed as part of the solution and should not be left for
> the unknown future.
> 
> Should we reformulate here?
> 
> I was expecting some recommendation since the changing of MAC address is 
> important to address privacy issues (discussed in section 5). Currently 
> it is left open with no recommendation , only saying that dynamic change 
> of MAC address is needed.
> 
> Maybe the document should have some normative language for example in 
> section 5.1 that will say that IP-OBU MUST dynamic change their MAC 
> addresses
> 
> Did the document go through security area review?
> 
> Roni
> 
> *From:*Gen-art [mailto:[e-mail]] *On Behalf Of *NABIL 
> BENAMAR
> *Sent:* Monday, June 17, 2019 12:48 PM
> *To:* Roni Even
> *Cc:* [e-mail]; IETF Discussion; [e-mail]; 
> [e-mail]
> *Subject:* Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of 
> draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-46
> 
> Dear Roni,
> 
> Thank you for your review.
> 
> Please, see my answers below.
> 
> On Sun, Jun 16, 2019, 09:52 Roni Even via Datatracker <[e-mail] 
> <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
> 
>     Reviewer: Roni Even
>     Review result: Almost Ready
> 
>     I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
>     Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
>     by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
>     like any other last call comments.
> 
>     For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
>     <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
>     Document: draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-??
>     Reviewer: Roni Even
>     Review Date: 2019-06-16
>     IETF LC End Date: 2019-06-26
>     IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
> 
>     Summary:
>     The document is almost ready for publication as a standard track RFC
> 
>     Major issues:
> 
>     Minor issues:
> 
>     1. Section 4.2  says "IP packets MUST be transmitted over 802.11-OCB
>     media as
>     QoS Data" while appendix F say "The STA may send data frames of
>     subtype Data,
>     Null, QoS Data, and
>            QoS Null.
> 
> I will update the appendix to reflect the text in section 4.2.
> 
> 
>     2. In section 5.2 "The policy dictating when the MAC address is
>     changed on the
>     802.11-OCB interface is to-be-determined.". Reading the next
>     sentence it looks
>     to me that this is needed as part of the solution and should not be
>     left for
>     the unknown future.
> 
> Should we reformulate here?
> 
> 
>     3. In Appendix I 4th paragraph " However, this does not apply if TBD
>     TBD TBD. "
>     .. What are the TBDs?
> 
> The whole sentence will be removed.
> 
> 
>     Nits/editorial comments:
>     1. In appendix I last paragraph "Support of RFC 8505 is may be
>     implemented on
>     OCB." should be "Support of RFC 8505 may be implemented on OCB." 2.
>     In Appendix
>     I "OCB nodes that support RFC 8505 would support the 6LN operation
>     in order to
>     act as a host".  I think that instead of "would" it should be
>     "should"  also if
>     this is a recommendation why not have this paragraph not in an
>     appendix with
>     "MAY" and "SHOULD
> 
> Agreed.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> its mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its
>