Re: [ipwave] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-46
NABIL BENAMAR <n.benamar@est.umi.ac.ma> Mon, 17 June 2019 17:38 UTC
Return-Path: <n.benamar@est.umi.ac.ma>
X-Original-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86A2A120461 for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Jun 2019 10:38:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=est-umi-ac-ma.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qR0ABeIM9KtI for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Jun 2019 10:38:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2d.google.com (mail-io1-xd2d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C20EF120465 for <its@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Jun 2019 10:38:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2d.google.com with SMTP id e5so23108266iok.4 for <its@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Jun 2019 10:38:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=est-umi-ac-ma.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=mPc53y9HaworHXEjgNi2yj6RS8viQ5bQDziTTV0zen0=; b=v5mBqyAGvS0W+0fdBBb1O3sjkpVUT2HFR8o98Uy9fzCefNbEHsUvuDR1iINsYlNvuc iFsw5ukLwptFDldLZkQVJrlLRipo7NbamUKMn5smuUtD/LSuJ+uWYpj+S+LIZgnaXppO MUpRFc3DoBLoZUMxwRPkW5QuNdqq0H976YnryaYlVDg0KTH0yDaADpla+YrmAok0nZr0 5xXiT55/hvFZGztQABG90qrwZLDe/nLoHvi6oU+S7fCsKmxVsQ1tJ6PjwnQ1JjFJX2pE UjHU90Nc3g7Eq9O/wGGrDVxVf4mr2C4JkC/ZGtbZFaDJy+exckEpCNG81Wl7dW8+qaVN gOfg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=mPc53y9HaworHXEjgNi2yj6RS8viQ5bQDziTTV0zen0=; b=gjEjBK+FjYDN8pejT0sUXQkvRfip6qqOmG5tXK128JVUMuUxT6WFFIQntmCnKuRGNA Q79RSM4j/oeIJQMG1CbBfSZfusIzdjDAu0bigzs4x7QdUhV4/B9Yu20if1sFv8l7gakR XpkZTPSZZheU3Kor32hwNrsXFwXLP73kV5SbS4x/6/1qvr8z9AIHNO/iu39G1Di9IZWD NCBzPUg29M4Pl2Y2awVaEd2gCKrsymEDTbv4TUTpTK5ZoK6DTcjVN50clH+Gn70kyrQF IxJYXM/2KqHlnkTvJjAFSowKCK530SKEvqp0C3m8v9AU+80ETshbG+x0uuqQMkmo0Wss vBgg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW5LwZP2XS2dPZFICe3MqOwglNbA6EVu8c0XOPORtlosTXiQ+qw Mx6B4PQxcvvz6A2hqdGO/VYalJ2CPaIObtsEm8RNLA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwznsfisFC1Eze3VcgmeHk+To7JvdzH80zesASuYDNrht8PdhZCVAQaUrO8fD1B6q2qoHO1MjXlW8GCiiD07QI=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:a90a:: with SMTP id n10mr70777840jam.61.1560793077032; Mon, 17 Jun 2019 10:37:57 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <156067514313.12185.6559961431451739070@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAD8vqFcngv75CvQTSY1vnL1TsLWoFVtw8b_q6hvBRRdSMDZZsw@mail.gmail.com> <6E58094ECC8D8344914996DAD28F1CCD18D37579@dggemm526-mbx.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <6E58094ECC8D8344914996DAD28F1CCD18D37579@dggemm526-mbx.china.huawei.com>
From: NABIL BENAMAR <n.benamar@est.umi.ac.ma>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 18:37:44 +0100
Message-ID: <CAD8vqFftVsUNaugQKLckMeLpCE61oJfy_NpCtREJ6TNJCO1+SA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Roni Even (A)" <roni.even@huawei.com>
Cc: Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, "its@ietf.org" <its@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb.all@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ffa612058b887415"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/its/kW8_0Ch5qBBC14zr3EmGZd2TvIw>
Subject: Re: [ipwave] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-46
X-BeenThere: its@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPWAVE - IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments WG at IETF <its.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/its/>
List-Post: <mailto:its@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 17:38:42 -0000
Hi Roni, I think we wrote this part some time ago...So what about the following: "an example of change policy is to change the MAC address of the OCB interface each time the system boots up" On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 2:25 PM Roni Even (A) <roni.even@huawei.com> wrote: > Thanks, > > The only comment left is: > > > 2. In section 5.2 "The policy dictating when the MAC address is changed on > the > 802.11-OCB interface is to-be-determined.". Reading the next sentence it > looks > to me that this is needed as part of the solution and should not be left > for > the unknown future. > > > > Should we reformulate here? > > > > I was expecting some recommendation since the changing of MAC address is > important to address privacy issues (discussed in section 5). Currently it > is left open with no recommendation , only saying that dynamic change of > MAC address is needed. > > Maybe the document should have some normative language for example in > section 5.1 that will say that IP-OBU MUST dynamic change their MAC > addresses > > > > Did the document go through security area review? > > > > Roni > > > > > > *From:* Gen-art [mailto:gen-art-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *NABIL > BENAMAR > *Sent:* Monday, June 17, 2019 12:48 PM > *To:* Roni Even > *Cc:* gen-art@ietf.org; IETF Discussion; its@ietf.org; > draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb.all@ietf.org > *Subject:* Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of > draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-46 > > > > Dear Roni, > > > > Thank you for your review. > > Please, see my answers below. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jun 16, 2019, 09:52 Roni Even via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> > wrote: > > Reviewer: Roni Even > Review result: Almost Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-?? > Reviewer: Roni Even > Review Date: 2019-06-16 > IETF LC End Date: 2019-06-26 > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > Summary: > The document is almost ready for publication as a standard track RFC > > Major issues: > > Minor issues: > > 1. Section 4.2 says "IP packets MUST be transmitted over 802.11-OCB media > as > QoS Data" while appendix F say "The STA may send data frames of subtype > Data, > Null, QoS Data, and > QoS Null. > > > > I will update the appendix to reflect the text in section 4.2. > > > 2. In section 5.2 "The policy dictating when the MAC address is changed on > the > 802.11-OCB interface is to-be-determined.". Reading the next sentence it > looks > to me that this is needed as part of the solution and should not be left > for > the unknown future. > > > > Should we reformulate here? > > > 3. In Appendix I 4th paragraph " However, this does not apply if TBD TBD > TBD. " > .. What are the TBDs? > > > > The whole sentence will be removed. > > > Nits/editorial comments: > 1. In appendix I last paragraph "Support of RFC 8505 is may be implemented > on > OCB." should be "Support of RFC 8505 may be implemented on OCB." 2. In > Appendix > I "OCB nodes that support RFC 8505 would support the 6LN operation in > order to > act as a host". I think that instead of "would" it should be "should" > also if > this is a recommendation why not have this paragraph not in an appendix > with > "MAY" and "SHOULD > > > > > > Agreed. > > > > -- Best Regards Nabil Benamar Associate Professor Department of Computer Sciences School of Technology Moulay Ismail University Meknes. Morocco
- [ipwave] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ip… Roni Even via Datatracker
- Re: [ipwave] Genart last call review of draft-iet… NABIL BENAMAR
- Re: [ipwave] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of… Roni Even (A)
- Re: [ipwave] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [ipwave] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of… NABIL BENAMAR
- Re: [ipwave] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of… Roni Even (A)
- Re: [ipwave] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [ipwave] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of… NABIL BENAMAR
- Re: [ipwave] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of… Roni Even (A)
- Re: [ipwave] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [ipwave] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of… Alexandre Petrescu