Re: [ipwave] Expertise on ND problems on OCB

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Thu, 25 April 2019 19:42 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9155E12049B; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 12:42:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZElya4ONdhKC; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 12:42:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2CC4120497; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 12:42:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.106] (p54A6CA34.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.166.202.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 44qndx0PJ4z12kH; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 21:42:44 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <CADnDZ8-nBqJLibwumn_p8AtmZ9P2wPgfMmTUme4-DPxCO5jRZg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 21:42:44 +0200
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "its@ietf.org" <its@ietf.org>, "int-dir@ietf.org" <int-dir@ietf.org>
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 577914162.3263969-779d82b2f78497d4c92b458a324530de
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <650B0FE9-2C26-40C5-8916-B190F3D54831@tzi.org>
References: <155169869045.5118.3508360720339540639@ietfa.amsl.com> <a8aad636-069c-4451-dbf1-72c1db2204ef@gmail.com> <CAD8vqFfx_FVi5NobrR1p6xEKjkSNa1_ZejgrEs3JPDHJQoxD7A@mail.gmail.com> <MN2PR11MB356570FDBC5798F155DDEE25D82C0@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CAMugd_Xce5cWLtVB4DbR1ZEaFbdfiRpXre9oq61ukRC+n+3cZw@mail.gmail.com> <D8D5F0B7.2F2BB8%sgundave@cisco.com> <D8D5F510.2F2BC8%sgundave@cisco.com> <3e716b4b-8236-0488-309c-7cd3a54db7b5@gmail.com> <D8D7B1E7.2F2CA2%sgundave@cisco.com> <CAD8vqFfSGKhw_ou3VB98C8r1gq=4WD8+f8C5P53C46k-0V+XuA@mail.gmail.com> <66e7c810-45a5-5244-59dc-4b764b6fb346@gmail.com> <1a6599ee-88f9-42d9-a208-918ba6711612@gmail.com> <11645738-6f95-82e5-48f1-ebc3ce54423e@gmail.com> <6aaea808-6013-cd73-c894-c29fd8c98ac8@gmail.com> <72f60b2f-0a3a-8d60-f6de-09c058913c33@earthlink.net> <CADnDZ8-nBqJLibwumn_p8AtmZ9P2wPgfMmTUme4-DPxCO5jRZg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb.all@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/its/khxLwn0knsQ_uN_5XlIPqb72Pt4>
Subject: Re: [ipwave] Expertise on ND problems on OCB
X-BeenThere: its@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPWAVE - IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments WG at IETF <its.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/its/>
List-Post: <mailto:its@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 19:42:50 -0000

>> 	• RFC 8505 isn't just about low power. 
> The titles says that, so the authors said that and including the IETF WG that published and examined it under such use cases

Actually, it doesn’t.

The title is 

Registration Extensions for IPv6 over
6LoWPAN Neighbor Discovery

because 6LoWPAN Neighbor Discovery was invented for 6LoWPAN before we started applying it to the entirety of 6Lo.

The RFC editor guidelines caused this title to be expanded to:

Registration Extensions for IPv6 over
Low-Power Wireless Personal Area Network (6LoWPAN) Neighbor Discovery

which is indeed the expansion of “6LoWPAN”, but does not help at all — it just muddies the waters by polluting the title with terms that are no longer relevant to the document at hand.

(I’m not going to go into the other parts of the current discussion; I have no idea how something like OCB can be discussed without acknowledging the hidden terminal problem, a.k.a. non-transitive connectivity, so it seems to me I won't have much to contribute.)

Grüße, Carsten