[ipwave] what is C-V2X: PC5 mode 4 'sidelink' without infrastructure, or V2I?

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Thu, 28 October 2021 13:25 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65B593A0FDD for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 06:25:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.669
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.669 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD=1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5m0nk826IfVj for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 06:25:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D4313A0B6D for <its@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 06:25:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by sainfoin-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 19SDP04b028804 for <its@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 15:25:00 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 15238203531 for <its@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 15:25:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet1-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet1-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.12]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09C01206469 for <its@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 15:25:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.8.35.150] (is154594.intra.cea.fr [10.8.35.150]) by muguet1-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 19SDOxV3024762 for <its@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 15:25:00 +0200
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------8abFB0qbYjxJlJNsqy3IwvLY"
Message-ID: <b179c0c8-837b-1214-a564-45742385fbf6@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 15:24:59 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.2.1
Content-Language: fr
To: IPWAVE WG <its@ietf.org>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/its/mb9CsRXelC_mPO32mXtUyNBJ7W0>
Subject: [ipwave] what is C-V2X: PC5 mode 4 'sidelink' without infrastructure, or V2I?
X-BeenThere: its@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPWAVE - IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments WG at IETF <its.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/its/>
List-Post: <mailto:its@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 13:25:09 -0000

A few definitions of C-V2X circulate:

C-V2X is LTE PC5 interface mode 4 'sidelink': it means it works only in 
a V2V or V2P manner, and thus C-V2X does not need infrastructure. This 
has been said a few times.

C-V2X means also V2I. This is said by e.g. the SIM8100 module 
description saying "The SIM8100 is a C-V2X module which supports C-V2X 
functionality through a PC5 interface for vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V), 
vehicle-to-pedestrian (V2P), and vehicle-toinfrastructure (V2I) 
applications" at https://www.simcom.com/product/SIM8100.html or "The 
module will most commonly be found in telematics boxes, telematics 
control units, advanced driver-assistance systems, C-V2X (V2V, _V2I_, 
V2P) systems)" at https://www.quectel.com/product/5g-c-v2x-ag55xq-series

What do you think?  Does C-V2X need infrastructure or can C-V2X work 
without infrastructure?

This is can guide our activity of IPv6 for C-V2X.

Alex