[ipwave] PC5 at 5.9GHz?

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Sun, 24 January 2021 12:48 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2526D3A0858 for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Jan 2021 04:48:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.649
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.649 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD=1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, GB_AFFORDABLE=1, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dnHBVdNqizIi for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Jan 2021 04:48:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from oxalide-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (oxalide-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADA963A0853 for <its@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Jan 2021 04:48:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr []) by oxalide-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 10OCmm4f003753 for <its@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Jan 2021 13:48:49 +0100
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost []) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id DEB082020A9 for <its@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Jan 2021 13:48:48 +0100 (CET)
Received: from muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr []) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5110202097 for <its@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Jan 2021 13:48:48 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [] ([]) by muguet2-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 10OCmm9l013532 for <its@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Jan 2021 13:48:48 +0100
To: IPWAVE WG <its@ietf.org>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <863a639c-175b-74c3-cab8-5f5e79d69f3f@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2021 13:48:48 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/its/qdW8yrLGPoNYktORKTTJSaKDrgQ>
Subject: [ipwave] PC5 at 5.9GHz?
X-BeenThere: its@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPWAVE - IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments WG at IETF <its.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/its/>
List-Post: <mailto:its@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2021 12:48:54 -0000


Is there cheaply available hardware to make work PC5 at 5.9GHz?  PC5 is
a part of 5G specs that deal with direct communications between
vehicles, presumably without SIM cards and without the involvement of a
Mobile Network Operator (MNO).

For my part, I think no, there is no PC5 hardware at 5.9GHz.

It is very likely, I think, that PC5 hardware (modems, interfaces) might
use a very different PHY layer than what 802.11-OCB uses.  That might be
the 'New Radio' (NR) of 5G.  NR is incompatible with 802.11 PHY layer.

There are no 5.9GHz bands, no spectrum, allocated neither in USA by FCC
nor in Europe by the Commission, for 'C-V2X' or for 'PC5' even though
there might have been a request for comments ('an 'NPRM') at FCC in USA
in that sense.  That NPRM did not lead to allocating 5.9GHz spectrum for
C-V2X.  It is one year now since that NPRM closed.

Currently, all 5.9GHz bands are fully allocated to 'DSRC' (or, 802.11 if
you wish, or 'ITS-G5').

However, I was pointed by a vehicle manufacturer to a router
manufacturer (Comsignia, see https://www.commsignia.com/hardware/)
description that states that one feature is "DSRC and C-V2X (PC5)
communication interfaces".  The price of that OBU is not displayed, but
I suspect it to be in the range of a couple thousand euros, which can
still be affordable, even though not for a series car whose price might
be highly affected.

Also, I was pointed to a recent cheap hardware "AirPrimeĀ® EM9190 5G NR
Sub-6 GHz and mmWave Module" which lists the following bands: "Sub-6:
n1, n2, n3, n5, n7, n8, n12, n20, n25, n28, n38, n40, n41, n48, n66,
n71, n77, n78, n79, mmWave: n257, n258, n260, n261".  In this list,
there are not the bands 'n46' and 'n47', which are the bands for 5.9GHz.

This brings me the question: is there cheap hardware for PC5 at 5.9GHz?