IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ipwave] Roman Danyliw's Abstain on draft-ietf-ipwave-vehicular-networking-30: (with COMMENT)

"Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong" <jaehoon.paul@gmail.com> Thu, 03 November 2022 01:40 UTC

Return-Path: <jaehoon.paul@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D45BC1524BC; Wed, 2 Nov 2022 18:40:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_HK_NAME_FM_MR_MRS=0.01, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8xzEio5MRqlm; Wed, 2 Nov 2022 18:40:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x434.google.com (mail-pf1-x434.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::434]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75718C1522A6; Wed, 2 Nov 2022 18:40:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x434.google.com with SMTP id y13so305438pfp.7; Wed, 02 Nov 2022 18:40:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=56a+CPTJyJatEqQkGf7QsInJTWVZGANNT9RpdB6Ox1g=; b=Ucw2vVdlvm9DOVHf2qR3Ci4huDwnFWRyZkd/qhNxobYOTPY0HEFKsHd1dMedK6fOWF McWAueg2xgtnk18Bn7EaHj06raoIwvEAbu22w8meWdmZu4hNWcogG9EaS3ErcpGOO/5N chUA25LezgWrLUwa0JoOP8rF9sUMH5xfqis2ZBoLtExbL9J4Dhb2mgyWCBdb9tOkWyfn 7rmu6pJ/66zyPR3ChTjGHo87omwL6cnLG2okU20MpL3sNJFhu3ZmYnmcOy5RY785MMov HV4U7O1dok8EKvnNbjogiWb4idB1NMrrySLn0RVGmNdwGoYlU8LhWKkuz4pZQuRMy7kz QYlA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=56a+CPTJyJatEqQkGf7QsInJTWVZGANNT9RpdB6Ox1g=; b=U54NQrHuWHg8H9qIrm91PkGOPfRHNLbaIcVackb/CycH0zHVTYJGLD5yhLx4lslugr g0AooSiuYojsz7jLESk1ikR2RdwoLa5KE6dDjMhwBHdt5A6JWTH4GJzpMaMhWiGjAC7Y yZeQ0kFCJyFUFoiSnLRe6dYtqxd2zo5zonSGrERf+RnVsEhOCiTCg4kUI/N6+jouRkg4 vgVhQma6C0JP/8JdlB+okVyDJ3nxZPbm+h3bN7xDs6agn1W4INTyVqBj1g68RkyWqnpq i+UXVqHBdBsb3ELj2Qkh7fAiHv9C8A+WQEy1mkvkEi+nruAU7vOYM2nEsVkKCZ5U/kyT Fn6A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf1sEhNB7k5Z9cR8rhIhXQnFFanGa8SEFhOH03mWfADlWm4Drbk6 KRltk/XKJuohkCNGBR+LWbyMnkqFMkIgEg3HIvo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM658xliR+JIvEKNyPJkiXl2l4uxBTV5qvfTuKpEqwWR4hhjkMpFBKW6fs7BOVM8fwa7gbIDkrGkb1KkmFC2HIk=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:150e:b0:56c:83b3:d148 with SMTP id q14-20020a056a00150e00b0056c83b3d148mr28233271pfu.48.1667439610262; Wed, 02 Nov 2022 18:40:10 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <166742897276.25784.14497820286897218098@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <166742897276.25784.14497820286897218098@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: "Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong" <jaehoon.paul@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2022 10:39:34 +0900
Message-ID: <CAPK2DexET58qdOH9iTVPeJqhYrO+F-4Y5GoJ1f+FWggKZTD_VQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>, Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-ipwave-vehicular-networking@ietf.org, ipwave-chairs@ietf.org, its@ietf.org, Carlos Bernardos <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>, skku-iotlab-members <skku-iotlab-members@googlegroups.com>, "Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong" <jaehoon.paul@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a7777505ec8709d4"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/its/r_9_kVbTVzM_pCvl74CK9AyGOFw>
Subject: Re: [ipwave] Roman Danyliw's Abstain on draft-ietf-ipwave-vehicular-networking-30: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: its@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPWAVE - IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments WG at IETF <its.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/its/>
List-Post: <mailto:its@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2022 01:40:13 -0000

Hi Roman,
Thanks for your review and comments.

Erik,
I think you can let this IPWAVE PS draft move forward as IESG approval.

IESG members,
Thanks for your help to improve this draft.

Best Regards,
Paul




On Thu, Nov 3, 2022 at 7:42 AM Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <
noreply@ietf.org> wrote:

> Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-ipwave-vehicular-networking-30: Abstain
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to
> https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/
> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ipwave-vehicular-networking/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Thank you to Daniel Migault for the SECDIR review.
>
> Thank you for making edits in response to my DISCUSS positions.  Despite
> these
> changes, it is my assessment that the security and privacy properties are
> not
> sufficiently described given the wide array of enabling technologies cited
> (e.g., credit-based authorization models, blockchain based authentication
> and
> logging, in vehicle credit card transactions).  Furthermore, the document
> references architectural elements such as “legal vehicles” and “legal …
> smartphones”; and threats such as “privacy breakage” without sufficient
> explanation.
>
> For the reasons above and a few noted by Rob Wilton in his ballot, I am
> abstaining on this document.  The IESG DISCUSS criteria
> (
> https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/iesg-discuss-criteria/#stand-disc
> )
> is not applicable to my above concerns since no protocol is being
> described and
> the guidance presented here is not intended to be implemented without
> significant further design and specification.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> its mailing list
> its@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email