[ipwave] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-47: (with COMMENT)

[Alvaro Retana via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Alvaro Retana has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-47: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

§4.3: I think that the MAYs used in this section are out of place as they only
state facts and not Normative behavior.   s/MAY/may

§4.5.2: "Future improvement to this specification SHOULD consider solutions for
these problems."  I understand the interest to consider the problems...but I
don't think there's any Normative action that results from using SHOULD. 
s/SHOULD/should