IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ipwave] Draft minutes of IPWAVE@IETF98 available

François Simon <fygsimon@gmail.com> Fri, 07 April 2017 09:53 UTC

Return-Path: <fygsimon@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 938ED1200DF for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 02:53:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qUcBFoTn2pqP for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 02:53:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x22d.google.com (mail-qt0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2AECA12783A for <its@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 02:53:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id c45so14886183qtb.1 for <its@ietf.org>; Fri, 07 Apr 2017 02:53:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=+dszM1/kxSxQjk0HQ/rsTIkBcI4efWB2XrewJfQYdgA=; b=jRRfUkgofDsGc27i9PoJHXIHdKfI5hHwhy8c1DTlosRfgCHSFoUCvZIKMehoUODjNB coWfdLFP8FsMc3M2XvwDKYfokkLqFQmIcVBSiOqdxMJoO07td89DHkCNbJHEiXsb+C0x lLDRYS3COiny28/CsQUVXa5WgXHk1g/jm3DGgTE8d0Y2gxxLBqw8QVEc3rgqsPl4GJ0A j9mI/UBzN8onxEx3uO3/5WPNCOl2+ndaSGFBnSTVD8e0Gjcda3/Q5OqnGzTFqv53xPvs H4PYDIaFFH4NHTymA6FWm1Tkni9lZatBMGQCaqjEIC7/uncv0Bgym+QWE6nuSwAH1Maa kJ1A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=+dszM1/kxSxQjk0HQ/rsTIkBcI4efWB2XrewJfQYdgA=; b=mn70tsI24a1en5Pb1Fa3Y76WKXoSGR6HSakM5uSstGfq6zDmoDA+FzsQolAwzoF9Zp JHGR4u/GZroZgEnOt6YY54DO0XrbVOMZH/dn/1QWVPdsJfBWij5scvLr0QmZvtMx7C5X H81R7L/Rjf8kVLhBtPB3Cfif93bOYG+r85KvPPdnNMW05D5FJ4CWiQUgLepn2EIHZUQu HzAmOSt5A0JRPqwzcdD9r3B3QA6DeICB4UOtgnKsB66ZqjwJw+TTwG6W86eNrU2RR32+ jaLZAHS4wS48cbtxgu+BGeEZpy8HKkBHx/zxhygjorUoDD0Tj3SeQqmT9TrhHAz/Pcqu vdQg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H14s+hDK5siabObJHAi6gmMDGEAY/3TnqSiwaCm8QbqUHPRQ6rFt0OKk9mJ2C/qng==
X-Received: by 10.200.50.165 with SMTP id z34mr38016040qta.205.1491558825255; Fri, 07 Apr 2017 02:53:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from FrancoisPC (pool-108-51-227-221.washdc.fios.verizon.net. [108.51.227.221]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i140sm2714793qke.22.2017.04.07.02.53.43 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 07 Apr 2017 02:53:44 -0700 (PDT)
From: François Simon <fygsimon@gmail.com>
To: 'Alexandre Petrescu' <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>, dickroy@alum.mit.edu, cjbc@it.uc3m.es, its@ietf.org, dickroy@alum.mit.edu
Cc: 'Russ Housley' <housley@vigilsec.com>
References: <1491334470.3575.9.camel@it.uc3m.es> <8057466055914FB89C1597E66E42926B@SRA6> <4d8204ff-44d5-ff3c-9c2f-3b54a90ace9a@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4d8204ff-44d5-ff3c-9c2f-3b54a90ace9a@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2017 05:53:41 -0400
Message-ID: <000201d2af84$d7222a10$85667e30$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0
Thread-Index: AQIxkudGJDk4xJox+nqkh+h/rYz2kgJU2rCcAk9/94ag1sDDMA==
Content-Language: en-us
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/its/yq4RV8C_U3fretFn2SgsEJtG7WI>
Subject: Re: [ipwave] Draft minutes of IPWAVE@IETF98 available
X-BeenThere: its@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPWAVE - IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments WG at IETF <its.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/its/>
List-Post: <mailto:its@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2017 09:53:50 -0000

Agree with all Dr. Roy's comments.   Fygs

-----Original Message-----
From: its [mailto:its-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alexandre Petrescu
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2017 7:44 AM
To: dickroy@alum.mit.edu; cjbc@it.uc3m.es; its@ietf.org
Cc: 'Russ Housley' <housley@vigilsec.com>
Subject: Re: [ipwave] Draft minutes of IPWAVE@IETF98 available

Dick,

Le 05/04/2017 à 01:40, Dick Roy a écrit :
> All,
>
> These are comments only, as I was not present at the meeting.
>
> 1) While there are such things as IEEE 802.11 beacons, they are NOT 
> sent when dot11OCBActivated is true.

Agreed.  The text is so too.

> 2) IEEE Std1609.2 DOES exist.
>
> 3) I would definitely NOT call the LLC sublayer "interface" between 
> the 802.11 MAC and the IPv6 networking layer SNAP.  SNAP is on its way 
> out, along with all the other 802.2 LLC functionality, AND most 
> importantly, communications in the 5.9GHz in the US use type encoding 
> (EPD if you are an IEEE Std802 O&M fan).  Call it what it
> is: "EPD".

Ok, we will keep the "EPD" layer in the figure.

Additionally, as presented in Chicago (slide 4), and based on your SNAP
comment above, I suggest the following SNAP text below:
> In addition to the description of interface between IP and MAC using 
> "Ethernet Adaptation Layer" and "Ethernet Protocol Discrimination 
> (EPD)" it is worth mentioning that SNAP [RFC1042] was used earlier to 
> carry the IPv6 Ethertype.

[...]

> 4) No single set of standards is going to "resolve the privacy 
> concern". Privacy is a system concept the takes a lot of effort at 
> every layer in the system to properly implement.
>
> 5) STAs operating OCB are NOT STAs operating in ad hoc mode; thus, OCB 
> STAs should not be labeled as ad hoc STAs.

Agreed.  OCB STAs will be labeled just "STA".

Alex

>
> Hope this helps.
>
> RR
>
> PS.  Alex, I don't believe the reflector problem has been resolved 
> yet, so forward this if you feel it's appropriate.
>
>
> -----Original Message----- From: its [mailto:its-bounces@ietf.org] On 
> Behalf Of Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano Sent: Tuesday, April 4,
> 2017 12:35 PM To: its@ietf.org Cc: Russ Housley Subject: [ipwave] 
> Draft minutes of IPWAVE@IETF98 available
>
> Hi,
>
> We've just posted the minutes:
>
> https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/98/minutes/minutes-98-ipwave-01
>
> Please send corrections/comments by Friday, Apr 7th.
>
> Thanks a lot to Danny and Bob for taking the minutes!
>
> Cheers,
>
> Carlos & Russ
>
> _______________________________________________ its mailing list 
> its@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its
>
>

_______________________________________________
its mailing list
its@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email