[ITU+IETF] working on Issue 6 (E.164 ...)

Andrew.Gallant@comsat.com Thu, 17 February 2000 15:37 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA16055 for <itu+ietf-archive@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Feb 2000 10:37:05 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA08069 for <itu+ietf-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Feb 2000 10:35:27 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA16050; Thu, 17 Feb 2000 10:37:04 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA08030; Thu, 17 Feb 2000 10:35:05 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA08009 for <itu+ietf@optimus.ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Feb 2000 10:35:03 -0500 (EST)
Received: from cqmx.corp.comsat.com (cqmx.corp.comsat.com [134.133.184.25]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA16037 for <itu+ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Feb 2000 10:36:38 -0500 (EST)
From: Andrew.Gallant@comsat.com
Received: from cqgate5.cmc.comsat.com ([134.133.162.20]) by cqmx.corp.comsat.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-0U10L2S100V35) with ESMTP id com for <itu+ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Feb 2000 10:35:44 -0500
Received: from ccMail by cqgate5.cmc.comsat.com (IMA Internet Exchange 3.13) id 0001045E; Thu, 17 Feb 2000 10:36:26 -0800
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2000 10:33:41 -0800
Message-ID: <0001045E.C22277@comsat.com>
To: itu+ietf@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: cc:Mail note part
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [ITU+IETF] working on Issue 6 (E.164 ...)
Sender: itu+ietf-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: itu+ietf-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Joint ITU+IETF Discussion List <itu+ietf.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: itu+ietf@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

     Hello, list.
     
     I'm working on Issue 6 from the Workshop, "E.164, URLs, and 
     'Telephony'", and I'd like ask for some input from this list about 
     which Internet-Drafts to look at.
     
     Quick context:  (1)  My (naive) searches of Internet-Drafts produced 
     more than 60(!) hits on I-Ds that mention E.164.  (2)  ITU-T SG2 
     begins four days before the I-D cutoff date for Adelaide.  (3)  If 
     work on Issue 6 did produce something of value by that time, then it 
     could perhaps go to Adelaide in a new I-D.
     
     My question to list members:  Which current Internet-Drafts mentioning 
     E.164 should I (or anyone interested) look at?  I'm looking for 
     suggestions that identify I-Ds where constructive comments (if any) 
     would be useful to IETF work.  And, I'd be grateful for feedback to 
     shorten/prioritize the list of I-Ds to read.
     
     Thanks.
     
     -Andy Gallant
     
     PS:  Note that from:
     
        http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/ietf-announce/msg06651.html
     
     "The IESG has approved the Internet-Draft 'URLs for Telephone Calls'
     <draft-antti-telephony-url-12.txt> as a Proposed Standard."

_______________________________________________
ITU+IETF mailing list
ITU+IETF@ietf.org
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/itu+ietf