[ITU+IETF] Re[2]: Key Exchange for Network Architectures (KENA)
Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Mon, 07 February 2000 22:55 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA23699 for <itu+ietf-archive@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Feb 2000 17:55:29 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA07402 for <itu+ietf-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Feb 2000 17:54:03 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA23694; Mon, 7 Feb 2000 17:55:28 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA07363; Mon, 7 Feb 2000 17:53:35 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA07344 for <itu+ietf@optimus.ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Feb 2000 17:53:33 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sj-mailhub-3.cisco.com (sj-mailhub-3.cisco.com [171.68.224.215]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA23687 for <itu+ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Feb 2000 17:54:57 -0500 (EST)
Received: from rhino (rhino.cisco.com [172.20.9.57]) by sj-mailhub-3.cisco.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA12648; Mon, 7 Feb 2000 15:13:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p7020-img-nt (fred-hm-dhcp1.cisco.com [171.69.128.116]) by rhino (SMI-8.6/CISCO.WS.1.1) with SMTP id OAA25590; Mon, 7 Feb 2000 14:57:32 -0800
Message-Id: <4.1.20000207144342.01b416d0@flipper.cisco.com>
X-Sender: fred@flipper.cisco.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2000 14:46:19 -0800
To: Andrew.Gallant@comsat.com
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
Cc: "Ash; Gerald R (Jerry); ALARC" <gash@att.com>, Emad Qaddoura <emadq@nortelnetworks.com>, Haseeb Akhtar <haseeb@nortelnetworks.com>, Mohamed Khalil <mkhalil@nortelnetworks.com>, itu+ietf@ietf.org, Raja Narayanan <raja@nortelnetworks.com>, "Shaw; Robert" <Robert.Shaw@itu.int>, "'fredgaechter@monmouth.com'" <fredgaechter@monmouth.com>, "Tar; John" <John.Tar@itu.int>
In-Reply-To: <00007843.C22219@comsat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Subject: [ITU+IETF] Re[2]: Key Exchange for Network Architectures (KENA)
Sender: itu+ietf-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: itu+ietf-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Joint ITU+IETF Discussion List <itu+ietf.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: itu+ietf@ietf.org
At 09:03 AM 2/4/00 -0500, Andrew.Gallant@comsat.com wrote: > Sorry, folks. I only joined the list a few days ago, and think I > missed the beginning of this thread. OK, let me give you the executive summary. I sent notes to various RFC and Internet Draft authors, anyone who used the Acronym "IMSI" or referenced E.212/E.214 in their documents, saying "is this the IMSI that the ITU likes to talk about?" I got a resounding "yes, oops, I guess we missed including the reference". One hopes that the result will be, at minimum, the inclusion of the reference. The authors of this draft specifically would like to know what the concern is. _______________________________________________ ITU+IETF mailing list ITU+IETF@ietf.org http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/itu+ietf