RE: [ITU+IETF] Re: IP-Telecoms

"Tar, John" <John.Tar@itu.int> Thu, 10 February 2000 08:35 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id DAA17484 for <itu+ietf-archive@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Feb 2000 03:35:07 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id DAA18241 for <itu+ietf-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Feb 2000 03:33:36 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id DAA17479; Thu, 10 Feb 2000 03:35:06 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id DAA18216; Thu, 10 Feb 2000 03:33:20 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id DAA18197 for <itu+ietf@optimus.ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Feb 2000 03:33:19 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mail1.itu.int (mail1.itu.ch [156.106.192.17]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id DAA17473 for <itu+ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Feb 2000 03:34:48 -0500 (EST)
Received: by mail1.itu.ch with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id <1TJB30CV>; Thu, 10 Feb 2000 09:35:37 +0100
Message-ID: <905DD86907DAD3119DE70000778D770F1AC0D0@mailsrv1.itu.ch>
From: "Tar, John" <John.Tar@itu.int>
To: 'Fred Baker' <fred@cisco.com>
Cc: itu+ietf@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [ITU+IETF] Re: IP-Telecoms
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2000 09:34:14 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: itu+ietf-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: itu+ietf-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Joint ITU+IETF Discussion List <itu+ietf.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: itu+ietf@ietf.org

Dear Fred,
Perhaps in our haste to make these Recommendations and Supplements available
to all Workshop participants,we erred in not explaining clearly that
everyone of the registered participants at the recent IP-Telecoms Workshop
was given their own individual username and password,so they all have free
[i.e.at no charge] access to these texts.
I thought that this course of action was a reasonable compromise between
ITU's official publication policy [which I am not at liberty to change] and
the ITU's need to excercise flexibility in our collaborative work with the
IETF,which I regard as very important and mutually beneficial.
Kind Regards,
John Tar

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Fred Baker [SMTP:fred@cisco.com]
> Sent:	Wednesday, February 09, 2000 6:14 PM
> To:	Dayao, Al
> Cc:	itu+ietf@ietf.org
> Subject:	[ITU+IETF] Re: IP-Telecoms
> 
> At 10:05 AM 2/9/00 +0100, Dayao, Al wrote:
> >The ITU-T Recommendations E.164, E.212 and Supplements 1&2 to E.164 are
> now
> >available on the IP-Telecoms page.
> >( http://www.itu.int/ITU-T/ip-telecoms/ip-telecoms.htm ) Access to the
> >documents is restricted to the Working Group.
> 
> How is that useful to the IETF contributors you are trying to make it
> available to? Are you asking me to post my name and password to the
> various
> telephony-related mailing lists, notably enum?
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ITU+IETF mailing list
> ITU+IETF@ietf.org
> http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/itu+ietf

_______________________________________________
ITU+IETF mailing list
ITU+IETF@ietf.org
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/itu+ietf