IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [iucg] [discuss] Conference: ICANN and Global Internet Governance: The Road to Sao Paulo, and Beyond, Singapore 21 March 2014

Elisabeth Blanconil <info@vgnic.org> Thu, 27 February 2014 15:11 UTC

Return-Path: <info@vgnic.org>
X-Original-To: iucg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iucg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8499C1A024F for <iucg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 07:11:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.531
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.531 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, MISSING_MID=0.497] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vstkzf4WkM2r for <iucg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 07:11:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from host.presenceweb.org (host.presenceweb.org [67.222.106.46]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99BBF1A02FF for <iucg@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 07:11:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=vgnic.org; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Cc:Subject:From:To:Date; bh=Au30KjIdOFfyjf7oDXjpcRJwBWNO0mDF01Uxn8vhUbA=; b=talPscUV3oq91LRPUAMPy7Yh10ScStu8kDaYqidUQrISz2PVvicCP7qipHpobam0qwImqg/BuUNVJ2Eb4cqCBRksEkTFSj+gQbvuBTnYtdyXGauoZRTSc+RiVXOgmpvu9jVMvcQQbEzwzHslTMdmT0BrNvLaB53vNz28oJD2mZs=;
Received: from 169.69.176.95.rev.sfr.net ([95.176.69.169]:49456 helo=Morfin-PC.vgnic.org) by host.presenceweb.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <info@vgnic.org>) id 1WJ2by-0005eh-TW; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 07:10:59 -0800
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 16:08:44 +0100
To: "Shatan, Gregory S." <GShatan@ReedSmith.com>, William Drake <wjdrake@gmail.com>
From: Elisabeth Blanconil <info@vgnic.org>
In-Reply-To: <DBD9F335EA4A684FA2640EEE94EEF2721988A941@USPDCMAIL002P.ree dsmith.com>
References: <50BEA799-0981-4F50-AE9E-A6A2A7359946@gmail.com> <03673.114022605581000511@us-mta-7.us.mimecast.lan> <DBD9F335EA4A684FA2640EEE94EEF2721988A941@USPDCMAIL002P.reedsmith.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - host.presenceweb.org
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - vgnic.org
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: host.presenceweb.org: authenticated_id: info+vgnic.org/only user confirmed/virtual account not confirmed
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iucg/7JPyjPkzR_-7z5Y4gJhQIOqXV5Q
Cc: "discuss@1net.org" <discuss@1net.org>, "iucg@ietf.org" <iucg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [iucg] [discuss] Conference: ICANN and Global Internet Governance: The Road to Sao Paulo, and Beyond, Singapore 21 March 2014
X-BeenThere: iucg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: internet users contributing group <iucg@ietf.org>
List-Id: internet users contributing group <iucg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iucg>, <mailto:iucg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/iucg/>
List-Post: <mailto:iucg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iucg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iucg>, <mailto:iucg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 15:11:04 -0000
X-Message-ID:
Message-ID: <20140418053223.2560.50171.ARCHIVE@ietfa.amsl.com>

At 09:17 27/02/2014, Shatan, Gregory S. wrote:
>Ad personam attacks add nothing but “noise” 
>to this or any other list.  I suppose this is my 
>punishment for challenging the use of “VGNIC-speak.”
>That said – am I the only one confused by the 
>reference to “interplus 2015 project 
>governance”?  If so, I look forward to someone 
>from outside the VGNIC sphere of influence explaining it.

You are the Gegory I refered to.
The is no attack! but care.
No punishment but kind concern about the problem 
you reported with our "VGNIC-speak".

You copied the iucg@ietf.org mailing list. I am 
sure your input will be considered. We already 
gave a definition of CGN, VGNIC, VGNICS on our site for you.
We will probably put links to the IUCG details on 
PLUS, interplus, etc. which concerns the higher 
layers not yet fully supported by the IEN 48 project non-IETF completion.
But please, give us time. We are not paid for that. And proceed by consensus.

>If I am not the Gregory to which you refer, my apologies.

Loves means never having to say you are sorry.
Hebe.

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email