Re: [iucg] [Ianaplan] IANAPLAN virtual meeting

[Pete Resnick <[e-mail]>]

On 9/22/14 7:07 PM, JFC Morfin wrote:
> A. This charter states both:
>
> 1. "The IANAPLAN working group is chartered to produce an IETF 
> consensus document that describes the expected interaction between the 
> IETF and the operator of IETF protocol parameters registries." This 
> implies (as the context clearly shows it) that a single operator is to 
> be considered.
>
> 2. The working group will assume that the following documents will 
> continue to be in effect: ... RFC 6220 - Defining the Role and 
> Function of IETF Protocol Parameter Registry Operators.
>
> Point 1 considers a single operator, something that point 2 formally 
> contradicts in considering and pertinently documenting the need for 
> multiple operators.

This is a mis-reading of the title of RFC 6220. It does not say, 
"Defining the Role and Function of *the* IETF Protocol Parameter 
Registry Operators". If you read the document, you will realize that it 
is referring to the role and function of *present or future* operators, 
but always takes as given that there will be a single operator at any 
one time.

There is no contradiction or ambiguity here. On this you simply made an 
error in reading.

pr

-- 
Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - [phone]