Re: [iucg] [Ianaplan] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-01.txt
JFC Morfin <jefsey@jefsey.com> Mon, 20 October 2014 07:01 UTC
Return-Path: <jefsey@jefsey.com>
X-Original-To: iucg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iucg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF9641A6FC4;
Mon, 20 Oct 2014 00:01:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.631
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.631 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, MISSING_MID=0.497]
autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 9KUxrVG-84eG; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 00:01:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from host.presenceweb.org (host.presenceweb.org [67.222.106.46])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1E0B1A6FC3;
Mon, 20 Oct 2014 00:01:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 253.216.130.77.rev.sfr.net ([77.130.216.253]:13641
helo=MORFIN-PC.mail.jefsey.com)
by host.presenceweb.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.82)
(envelope-from <jefsey@jefsey.com>)
id 1Xg6xv-0004PU-0h; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 00:01:15 -0700
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 09:01:11 +0200
To: Seth Johnson <seth.p.johnson@gmail.com>,
"ianaplan@ietf.org" <ianaplan@ietf.org>,Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
From: JFC Morfin <jefsey@jefsey.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse,
please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - host.presenceweb.org
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - jefsey.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: host.presenceweb.org: authenticated_id:
jefsey+jefsey.com/only user confirmed/virtual account not confirmed
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iucg/dbsQwM5LuXEfN0QGdOwy2NVE2VE
Cc: "iucg@ietf.org" <iucg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [iucg] [Ianaplan] I-D Action:
draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-01.txt
X-BeenThere: iucg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: internet users contributing group <iucg@ietf.org>
List-Id: internet users contributing group <iucg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iucg>,
<mailto:iucg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/iucg/>
List-Post: <mailto:iucg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iucg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iucg>,
<mailto:iucg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 07:01:17 -0000
X-Message-ID:
Message-ID: <20141020070119.18893.73626.ARCHIVE@ietfa.amsl.com>
At 17:02 17/10/2014, Seth Johnson wrote: >Policy sources other than the RFCs and the system developed between >the IETF and the operator could affect that system. Correct. Also parallel or higher layer technology sources. There must be support for a technological multistakeholderism respecting the cooperation principle that founds the RFC 6852 Modern Paradigm for Standards: "Cooperation. Respectful cooperation between standards organizations, whereby each respects the autonomy, integrity, processes, and intellectual property rules of the others". A minima, the deliverable of this WG should be endorsed by IEEE and W3C. A norma, it should discuss the way its arrangements' incumbents will welcome newcomers. A maxima, it should document how every user can adapt it to his/her own needs without unbalancing the whole global set up. jfc