Re: [iucg] [discuss] surveillance governance,, etc.

McTim <dogwallah@gmail.com> Sat, 22 March 2014 17:03 UTC

Return-Path: <dogwallah@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: iucg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iucg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C44C1A0794 for <iucg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 10:03:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZxW6QcuOU7MW for <iucg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 10:03:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qg0-x231.google.com (mail-qg0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::231]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0095D1A0128 for <iucg@ietf.org>; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 10:03:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qg0-f49.google.com with SMTP id z60so11164816qgd.8 for <iucg@ietf.org>; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 10:03:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=ghiofX3XzC0j44wcsIaePIq2RsBICOvTbRU3j82FfrM=; b=zruHM1hpggxMpp+Jzc83j1l7yRqQ210M5ff0V55PlL9/0YAvW1yswEr6UMjGQarYD8 d36VrkfJbbWi6cMS4OAvF14eqqKTvunqTj8HBjP0NXzVfCRA5sxKHQdP7VeFL9OPEQlM P4IukfGAgshhLPZsrB94N/yCc231MYw5LBSX3Pqq5z3V1r7uWGd4OSNSV5Qd6SHheGy5 FVSh97vg1uTnxbkolJD2hBDIOnB9jHYjAHUCdmtNyNVxb0CIv4F2EVMnJl/bJgGpsGLx LOYBFM/JdpjvyeCwGbZX+6ldjJcR5IIeWQSbOzRVUErs418PPRpLHQtlKlsxhjTpKHC/ 09+Q==
X-Received: by 10.140.108.2 with SMTP id i2mr2780595qgf.80.1395507783522; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 10:03:03 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.80.229 with HTTP; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 10:02:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <532db256.07fd420a.2887.ffffacb4SMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com>
References: <CAOxRbV9oKLg3Q2vWHNd+iB8aosmg=5cXrPFLLXCcSpj2JhEHBA@mail.gmail.com> <5327E896.9000808@itforchange.net> <2DA93620FC07494C926D60C8E3C2F1A8016420AD@server1.medienkomm.uni-halle.de> <82D12391-2ABB-4657-8B4C-58962569937D@Malcolm.id.au> <CAOxRbV-sBU9TjdvPhoMrH88s-8YoSE=dOyzu9FiOqPfcSE4yvg@mail.gmail.com> <4BF15867-13C5-4AB5-8FC7-91969AA99D4F@darwin.ptvy.ca.us> <F6BA8E18-5F0A-4CBD-8570-F9046A21AFAE@istaff.org> <56496CD0-13CD-44BB-AD4F-A24CFD47080D@darwin.ptvy.ca.us> <DBD9F335EA4A684FA2640EEE94EEF27222C0B5ED@USPDCMAIL002P.reedsmith.com> <F861454C-61AA-4F55-B12A-7819BC19D9AF@difference.com.au> <532d6718.c15fc20a.60a0.21edSMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com> <CACAaNxg3EjQA9_gbx3Md7WgJWpr=3GidzYzq0ZTcbOJfyUqnOw@mail.gmail.com> <012001cf4532$76fae830$64f0b890$@gmail.com> <20140321183053.GA38840@mx1.yitter.info> <014301cf4535$c767b700$56372500$@gmail.com> <20140321185735.GB38840@mx1.yitter.info> <532cd2b2.e7bcb40a.4a94.ffffed9fSMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com> <CACAaNxiPvjU0tCoGEByfeb3bETu6Kh7uDNLy-ObmdC2P22dYWA@mail.gmail.com> <532d8c7e.8259440a.5ba8.ffffe7ebSMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com> <CACAaNxiwTTBnGqr4mVf3DS7NecRbBRzJM5P-_-SBxgZLxugrpQ@mail.gmail.com> <532db256.07fd420a.2887.ffffacb4SMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com>
From: McTim <dogwallah@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 13:02:23 -0400
Message-ID: <CACAaNxjLmEiT_YSAb3rWuU0BST+2Mh=_Twc2rrARz80E2K-TDw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jefsey <jefsey@jefsey.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113ab74ab7e1f004f534f9f1
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iucg/N_nq78goiqIncYgMe1DIjXpwGtc
Cc: David Cake <dave@difference.com.au>, comptoir@cafedu.com, "discuss@1net.org" <discuss@1net.org>, iucg@ietf.org, Michel Gauthier <mg@telepresse.com>
Subject: Re: [iucg] [discuss] surveillance governance,, etc.
X-BeenThere: iucg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: internet users contributing group <iucg@ietf.org>
List-Id: internet users contributing group <iucg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iucg>, <mailto:iucg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/iucg/>
List-Post: <mailto:iucg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iucg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iucg>, <mailto:iucg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 17:03:07 -0000

Jefsey,


On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Jefsey <jefsey@jefsey.com> wrote:

> At 13:28 22/03/2014, McTim wrote:
>
>> Why am I involved in this thread?
>>
>
> Because you disregarded Michel Gauthier's reminder about IAB RFC 3869.
>


I didn't 'disregard" it, I merely pointed out that it wasn't germane.



>
>  I've not commented at all since the subject line was changed and we went
>> down this particular rathole.
>> Leave me out of this nonsense please!
>>
>
> I understand that this rathole and nonsense is the world peace. IMHO, you
> might be unfamiliar with press. Your kind of comments (this is your right),
> damages the image of the Dubai minority.
>


I did't comment at all in this new thread until you pulled me in.  It is
silly to suggest that anything I say can damage the reputations of dozens
of governments.



>
>  So far, you are not even speculating that there is an 'influencing
>> strategy", you are merely posting random factoids seemingly in support of
>> the other MGs snide insinuations.
>>
>
> This strategy is plainly, publicly, and authoritatevely documented as
> such. In case you are not aware:
> http://www.ntia.doc.gov/press-release/2014/ntia-announces-
> intent-transition-key-internet-domain-name-functions



Complete non-sequitor.  This announcement is NOT about IETF funding or the
alleged influencing of the IETF due to funding meetings.



>
>
> Your comments on DNS-ORC and CAIDA (Michel Gauthier could have extended to
> W3C) show that you have not read the Farewell address I quoted.



One has nothing to do with the other.



> I really advise you to do it.




I have, several times.  We obviously disagree on its meaning.



> There are good answers there to *every* "principle" (as Fadi would say)
> question discusssed on this list. Astonishing and refreshing, as it is a
> good, strong and determined US position set that for once everyone can most
> probably consensually adopt. And start from there.
>
>  My question to you still stands.
>> How would you like the IETF to be funded??
>>
>
> If you ask this to a journalist he will only report you do not any
> response yourself.
>


I think I made clear that I thought it was good news.


-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route
indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel