Re: [iucg] [Ianaplan] From yesterday's interim: managing IANA operator change and avoiding confusion
JFC Morfin <jefsey@jefsey.com> Thu, 09 October 2014 09:00 UTC
Return-Path: <jefsey@jefsey.com>
X-Original-To: iucg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iucg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 716361ACCFA;
Thu, 9 Oct 2014 02:00:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.631
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.631 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, MISSING_MID=0.497]
autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 2zkEkVlzYldv; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 02:00:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from host.presenceweb.org (host.presenceweb.org [67.222.106.46])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6AC0F1ACCF0;
Thu, 9 Oct 2014 02:00:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 192.102.176.95.rev.sfr.net ([95.176.102.192]:61610
helo=GHM-SAM.dot.dj) by host.presenceweb.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.82)
(envelope-from <jefsey@jefsey.com>)
id 1Xc9aA-0004i7-Qf; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 02:00:23 -0700
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 11:00:25 +0200
To: rhill@hill-a.ch,"Andrei Robachevsky" <andrei.robachevsky@gmail.com>,
"Alissa Cooper" <alissa@cooperw.in>,
"Miles Fidelman" <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net>
From: JFC Morfin <jefsey@jefsey.com>
In-Reply-To: <GLEAIDJPBJDOLEICCGMNAEMGCLAA.rhill@hill-a.ch>
References: <543634B4.4060602@gmail.com>
<GLEAIDJPBJDOLEICCGMNAEMGCLAA.rhill@hill-a.ch>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse,
please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - host.presenceweb.org
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - jefsey.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: host.presenceweb.org: authenticated_id:
intl+dot.dj/only user confirmed/virtual account not confirmed
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iucg/WEEKdw1cMrGhLsii1CcQbekA1uA
Cc: ianaplan@ietf.org, IAB <iab@iab.org>, "iucg@ietf.org" <iucg@ietf.org>,
iesg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [iucg] [Ianaplan] From yesterday's interim: managing IANA
operator change and avoiding confusion
X-BeenThere: iucg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: internet users contributing group <iucg@ietf.org>
List-Id: internet users contributing group <iucg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iucg>,
<mailto:iucg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/iucg/>
List-Post: <mailto:iucg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iucg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iucg>,
<mailto:iucg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 09:00:25 -0000
X-Message-ID:
Message-ID: <20141009090031.28612.44626.ARCHIVE@ietfa.amsl.com>
At 09:12 09/10/2014, Richard Hill wrote: >I agree with Andrei. Yes. But one does not change people and their habits. One change their context. Things are simple: if the nexus is not the USG anymore what will it be? ICANN/Business, ITU/Gov, IUse/people, a World Digital Organization, or chaos? Unless some want the IETF to be that nexus, the IETF is not to side with one camp but to make sure the internet is ready for the context resulting from any of them. > > Yes, the authority doesn't come from a contract. But the contract can > > help minimize possible confusion in the future. The hardcoded registry > > location is a pretty strong lever in whatever possible future > > negotiations, IMO. > > > > Andrei Note: I know most of the people on the ianaplan mailing list do not read my posts. They are writen for those who work for an intelligent world for all rather than a world of intelligence on all and for the coming negociation background and probable (?) IETF higher layers fork. This is ***their*** decision - unless the IESG, IAB, ISOC jfc PS. The GSN concept that guide the world: "A global solution network consists of diverse stakeholders, organized to address a global problem, making use of transnational networking, and with membership and governance that are self-organized". This has a name: in politics, a lobby, in the real world, an enhanced global coalition of global interests and RFC 6852 communities toward the RFC 6852 "huge bounty". Such nexus architectonically oppose a WSIS people centered society. http://gsnetworks.org/sponsorship/ http://www.libertyglobal.com/about-us.html http://www.rockefellerfoundation.org/ http://www.rbc.com/aboutus/index.html http://google.com etc.