Re: [iucg] [Ianaplan] Suggested text

[JFC Morfin <[e-mail]>]

At 09:13 12/10/2014, Martin J. Dürst wrote:
>Some other organizations (governments, ITU,...) may want to claim 
>that after NTIA is gone, stability has decreased. Whatever we can do 
>to reduce their argumentation surface is probably a good thing.

Martin,

this is exactly what we (as Libre and citizens) feel. This trust 
decrease will also affect the IETF in proportion to the 
firmeness/adequation of the position adopted by this WG.

This is why the "mycann plug-in" definition and development projects 
start receiving some momentum and support. I frankly doubt they can 
be prevented (dont ask me the date as this is new development or 
political decision) because some Govs already have one and we all 
know that any geek can navigate the internet without paying attention to ICANN.

However, their generalization, together with the coexistence with new 
technologies (NDN, SDN, VGN conception) is actually leading to the, 
long "status-quoed", IEN 48 second objective.

This will be something like a "super-NAT" case. If we do not pay 
attention to it, we will not be entitled to complain afterward. The 
IETF should consider the end to end interface aspects of this fringe 
to fringe resulting middleware.

jfc

PS. I know nobody cares. My mails are just to demonstrate it.