Re: [iucg] [governance] Rupert Murdoch Says Businesses Should Have A Larger Say in Public Policy
Jefsey <jefsey@jefsey.com> Fri, 18 July 2014 10:53 UTC
Return-Path: <jefsey@jefsey.com>
X-Original-To: iucg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iucg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4AF11B299D
for <iucg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 03:53:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.631
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.631 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, MISSING_MID=0.497]
autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id Lde8eOnjgkTM for <iucg@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Fri, 18 Jul 2014 03:53:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from host.presenceweb.org (host.presenceweb.org [67.222.106.46])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCC341B299B
for <iucg@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 03:53:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 50.45.176.95.rev.sfr.net ([95.176.45.50]:23774
helo=MORFIN-PC.mail.jefsey.com)
by host.presenceweb.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.82)
(envelope-from <jefsey@jefsey.com>)
id 1X85nD-0003mo-8i; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 03:53:35 -0700
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 12:53:26 +0200
To: governance@lists.igcaucus.org, Suresh Ramasubramanian <suresh@hserus.net>,
<governance@lists.igcaucus.org>,Paul Wilson <pwilson@apnic.net>,
Pranesh Prakash <pranesh@cis-india.org>
From: Jefsey <jefsey@jefsey.com>
In-Reply-To: <14748f9c7f8.27e9.4f968dcf8ecd56c9cb8acab6370fcfe0@hserus.n et>
References: <53C86C12.9070804@cis-india.org>
<C8F0D157-B3DC-44B0-9DA2-F96ED498F9AB@apnic.net>
<E1X855I-0000Vm-Ei@igcaucus.org>
<14748f9c7f8.27e9.4f968dcf8ecd56c9cb8acab6370fcfe0@hserus.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse,
please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - host.presenceweb.org
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - jefsey.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: host.presenceweb.org: authenticated_id:
jefsey+jefsey.com/only user confirmed/virtual account not confirmed
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iucg/pS419_j9OSk5dRZTBxZDhdFuBeY
Cc: "iucg@ietf.org" <iucg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [iucg] [governance] Rupert Murdoch Says Businesses Should Have
A Larger Say in Public Policy
X-BeenThere: iucg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: internet users contributing group <iucg@ietf.org>
List-Id: internet users contributing group <iucg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iucg>,
<mailto:iucg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/iucg/>
List-Post: <mailto:iucg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iucg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iucg>,
<mailto:iucg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 10:53:41 -0000
X-Message-ID:
Message-ID: <20140718105402.15733.50680.ARCHIVE@ietfa.amsl.com>
At 12:17 18/07/2014, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: >There are government reps and civil society groups that are just as >'good' ad Mr murdochs people are. They still do get a say in msm. So >despite everything, it will survive. I just that existing civil society groups may be inflitrated by NSAs, but are not representing interests of Independant Users like me, cities and villages, trades and cultures, private corporations, NGOs and Libre communities as such, I am supposed to interface at the IETF. Best jfc >On 18 July 2014 3:45:01 pm Jefsey <jefsey@jefsey.com> wrote: > >>At 11:32 18/07/2014, Paul Wilson wrote: >> >God help the multistakeholder process if News Corp gets involved. >> >>Paul, >> >>are you meaning that News Corps are not (equal) stakeholders in the >>Information Society? Why would they not be on an equal footing with >>states and other stakeholders? What is worrying is an MS process >>where there are undefined "indirect" stakeholders and where >>independent users are not on an equal footing with everyone else. >> >>He does not plead for News Corp to have a larger say than ICANN, RIR, >>manufacturer, edge provider, ISP, etc. and other kind of >>corporations. But that the role permitted to the News Corps, and >>Corps in general, should be larger than what it is currently >>permitted in order to be in accordance to their effective weight in >>the human/computer/corporation society of today. >> >>I hope you do not say the same about independent users (IUsers)? >> >>Take care. >>jfc >> >> >> > > > > > >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit >Content-Disposition: inline; filename="message-footer.txt" > >____________________________________________________________ >You received this message as a subscriber on the list: > governance@lists.igcaucus.org >To be removed from the list, visit: > http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing > >For all other list information and functions, see: > http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance >To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see: > http://www.igcaucus.org/ > >Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t