[iucg] Internet algorithmic governance
Jefsey <jefsey@jefsey.com> Thu, 07 August 2014 17:02 UTC
Return-Path: <jefsey@jefsey.com>
X-Original-To: iucg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iucg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D80121B2E9E
for <iucg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Aug 2014 10:02:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 3.145
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.145 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, MISSING_MID=0.497,
URIBL_RHS_DOB=1.514] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id d2ZvekHBpdkO for <iucg@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Thu, 7 Aug 2014 10:02:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from host.presenceweb.org (host.presenceweb.org [67.222.106.46])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E8351B2E9C
for <iucg@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Aug 2014 10:02:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 21.104.14.81.rev.sfr.net ([81.14.104.21]:19945
helo=MORFIN-PC.mail.jefsey.com)
by host.presenceweb.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.82)
(envelope-from <jefsey@jefsey.com>) id 1XFR51-0001XZ-9u
for iucg@ietf.org; Thu, 07 Aug 2014 10:02:19 -0700
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2014 19:02:09 +0200
To: "iucg@ietf.org" <iucg@ietf.org>
From: Jefsey <jefsey@jefsey.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse,
please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - host.presenceweb.org
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - jefsey.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: host.presenceweb.org: authenticated_id:
jefsey+jefsey.com/only user confirmed/virtual account not confirmed
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iucg/QE3mOApA-W9VGDzcJtzubOXCwaI
Subject: [iucg] Internet algorithmic governance
X-BeenThere: iucg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: internet users contributing group <iucg@ietf.org>
List-Id: internet users contributing group <iucg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iucg>,
<mailto:iucg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/iucg/>
List-Post: <mailto:iucg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iucg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iucg>,
<mailto:iucg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2014 17:02:22 -0000
X-Message-ID:
Message-ID: <20140807170224.11744.74449.ARCHIVE@ietfa.amsl.com>
Dear all, in the past months the IUCG has been victim of hacking at the incitation of pro-ICANN aficiniados. In order to keep the situation cool I did not react and gave time to time. It now seems that the NTIA request (http://www.ntia.doc.gov/press-release/2014/ntia-announces-intent-transition-key-internet-domain-name-functions) to ICANN is going to a dead end. The reason why is that the ICANN community does not seem to consider the NTIA request that only concerns the replacement of the NTIA's role in the DNS class "IN" ICANN/NTIA, while the ICANN debate revolves on the IANA transition. This creates an important risk of conflict and unstability on the DNS and IANA, at a time RFC 6852 has acknowledged standardization fragmentation of the internet and its unity trough a common architecture, a common standardization paradigm based upon a supposed common economic interest of its different markets and global communities. The technical suggestions proposed by the members of the ICANN communities are essentially "IANALs'" unconstitutional blahblahblah (how the NTIA could trick the US law). More seriously the only solution seems to be for the entire IANA like matters to be engineered as law/fool-proof through an "algorithmic governance" stewardship, i.e. - one commonly accessible (Libre) cartographic tool of the network topology, spaces, and standards of any SDO, community or manufacturer - a system of servers running this process in parallel and mutually checking their findings. This system will be organized and managed by MYCANN, http://mycann.org/ - making these findings available through a "netiana" open protocol and readers. This way the legal/political/economic/cultural responsibility lays with the authors of the data, not with their online "echo". If the polycratic or state digitglobal community wants to filters or broadcast some information, this will be made possible. Such a system operational interest is in proportion to the number of its users. Its architectural interest is immediate as it provides an alternative to be tested and considered in other propositions. jfc