IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [iucg] [discuss] Conference: ICANN and Global Internet Governance: The Road to Sao Paulo, and Beyond, Singapore 21 March 2014

John Curran <jcurran@istaff.org> Thu, 27 February 2014 16:21 UTC

Return-Path: <jcurran@istaff.org>
X-Original-To: iucg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iucg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F55A1A0234 for <iucg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 08:21:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g317nLJKx6wC for <iucg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 08:21:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org (mho-03-ewr.mailhop.org [204.13.248.66]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E7731A0104 for <iucg@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 08:21:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from xarin.arin.net ([192.149.252.135] helo=[192.168.36.156]) by mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <jcurran@istaff.org>) id 1WJ3i1-000DtW-Nf; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 16:21:17 +0000
X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn
X-Originating-IP: 192.149.252.135
X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information)
X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX1+PxX9gqPuILma+icNUUTot
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\))
From: John Curran <jcurran@istaff.org>
In-Reply-To: <20140227151201.AE06D213694@smtp2.arin.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 11:20:45 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <71C588C8-5121-4C5D-B220-8D350ED5CE50@istaff.org>
References: <50BEA799-0981-4F50-AE9E-A6A2A7359946@gmail.com> <03673.114022605581000511@us-mta-7.us.mimecast.lan> <DBD9F335EA4A684FA2640EEE94EEF2721988A941@USPDCMAIL002P.reedsmith.com> <20140227151201.AE06D213694@smtp2.arin.net>
To: Elisabeth Blanconil <info@vgnic.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iucg/rrvTuqtqlowIoNY1kW9_Dt-ja_A
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 09:17:16 -0800
Cc: William Drake <wjdrake@gmail.com>, "Shatan, Gregory S." <GShatan@ReedSmith.com>, "discuss@1net.org" <discuss@1net.org>, "iucg@ietf.org" <iucg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [iucg] [discuss] Conference: ICANN and Global Internet Governance: The Road to Sao Paulo, and Beyond, Singapore 21 March 2014
X-BeenThere: iucg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: internet users contributing group <iucg@ietf.org>
List-Id: internet users contributing group <iucg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iucg>, <mailto:iucg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/iucg/>
List-Post: <mailto:iucg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iucg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iucg>, <mailto:iucg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 16:21:24 -0000

On Feb 27, 2014, at 10:08 AM, Elisabeth Blanconil <info@vgnic.org> wrote:

> No punishment but kind concern about the problem you reported with our "VGNIC-speak".

Hebe - 
 
  I will admit to similar issues with regarding the abundance of VGNIC
  terminology when it comes to postings on the 1net discuss list.  I do
  realize that some of the "new" terminology refers to existing Internet
  concepts (only more generalized) but believe in the end that it may be
  inhibiting ability of folks to understand the specific recommendations
  that the IUCG are making when it comes to ICANN, IANA functions, etc.

  It might significantly improve understanding of those on the 1net discuss
  list if the IUCG community could use existing ICANN and Internet governance
  terminology for its input on the list.  If this isn't possible, feel free
  to disregard, but presently the lack of specific suggestions using common
  vernacular may be inhibiting actual communication of ideas.

Thanks!
/John

Disclaimer: My views alone.

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email