Re: [iucg] [discuss] vgnic - mdrs information
Desiree <desiree@relax.co.uk> Wed, 26 February 2014 09:43 UTC
Return-Path: <desiree@relax.co.uk>
X-Original-To: iucg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iucg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com
(Postfix) with ESMTP id AC5401A0188 for <iucg@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Wed, 26 Feb 2014 01:43:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.401
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8,
GB_I_LETTER=-2, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MANGLED_OFF=2.3,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dzGbr9QtYwsx for
<iucg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 01:43:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ee0-f54.google.com (mail-ee0-f54.google.com
[74.125.83.54]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F7A31A0172 for
<iucg@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 01:43:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ee0-f54.google.com with SMTP id c41so355614eek.27 for
<iucg@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 01:43:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net;
s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:subject:mime-version:content-type:from
:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to;
bh=+l5EafH+VgsLhE8yLWv3WYDZPOac9Jm1CjDM89QQAlM=;
b=bEOw58ee0sBghM5CocdQUcWpdyNInf7S61ePx2C3r+yxKmRzeHEeXsj3iQeTeviecg
6l7TYwUjXlpwQUQOSUu1RXHXSmtzzKOu+gr/V4jZYAwHHjtiBR2AZ2vVyHdWaOEDCINv
yIRUC/GrlejOiRd+mo/eG3OxUNN4EhjBfrC4olq9m9KwY7fuQIsSZeFLowSq0bWkjweQ
QpMThgP+JE91CyndDs+wlGuk7MhV6HjUnFtVL8uZh8Y4SNbmbGR34PryeCAoTDgLdvZD
UYmckcsM0gblzkgMI/W9fZV/yCdNC8TCvY/TDAdJFEFzlnbl36k9cvPeYEkSPFW+CKMd dZSA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmItsZmfO38som0p3WwF05PzS6YP0XHbyyijOY3XiDfRsk7HVTE2+1OOO1tb83F8uveHdYO
X-Received: by 10.14.225.67 with SMTP id y43mr5622520eep.10.1393407785789;
Wed, 26 Feb 2014 01:43:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.246] (cable-24-135-55-78.dynamic.sbb.rs.
[24.135.55.78]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id
k41sm1533774een.19.2014.02.26.01.43.02 for <multiple recipients>
(version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
Wed, 26 Feb 2014 01:43:04 -0800 (PST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="Apple-Mail=_F5D22D21-C975-4A5C-811F-7E1ADCAB698C"
From: Desiree <desiree@relax.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <530d595c.f18ec20a.2fd0.ffffe6e2SMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 09:43:08 +0000
Message-Id: <0B0B619B-22E1-4F7F-876C-7460790483DF@relax.co.uk>
References: <530d595c.f18ec20a.2fd0.ffffe6e2SMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com>
To: Elisabeth Blanconil <info@vgnic.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iucg/uYup094dSRsOFI3FG3C84T5YyeI
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 06:54:20 -0800
Cc: "discuss@1net.org" <discuss@1net.org>, iucg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [iucg] [discuss] vgnic - mdrs information
X-BeenThere: iucg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: internet users contributing group <iucg@ietf.org>
List-Id: internet users contributing group <iucg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iucg>,
<mailto:iucg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/iucg/>
List-Post: <mailto:iucg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iucg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iucg>,
<mailto:iucg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 09:43:12 -0000
On 26 Feb 2014, at 03:00, Elisabeth Blanconil wrote: Hi Hebe Thank you for your effort in putting up these mock-ups for the discussion. However I fail to understand how we could have a productive discussion if we do not get your data correct and do not share the same terminology. > on http://vgnics.net/MDRS.htm you will find three files. > > 1. a list of the top zone name server constallation coordinators and/or managers: For example in your map you put the following country, New Zealand as a contact for the Internet Software Consortium? It may be one of the instances of the root server installed there, but I believe you should also know that the ISC is based out of Southern California. A0046 ICANN-F f.root-servers.net 3557 Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.56 Auckland NZ 1 I am confused as to why would you choose to put one instance of the F root server here under the NZ? As David Conrad earlier indicated earlier to you, you can find all the instances of all root server here, including the geographical presentation to add to your textual one and update your map with more accurate information: http://www.root-servers.org/ So if you scroll to the bottom of the page you will find any of these "top zone name servers" and their copies by choosing any letter any of the 13 letters. For example you will instantly see the number, 55 for all the current instances of F root server. > 2. the number of top zone name servers number per ISO 3166 country codes: http://vgnics.net/VGN-NR3166.txt I believe what you call top zone name server is a a root server and any of its installed instances around the world. > 3. the list of the top zone servers with contacts for those I know: http://vgnics.net/VGN-TZH.txt Again, same comment as number one with regards to F. http://www.iana.org/domains/root/servers > > These are hand made mock-ups to help discussing the project. Thanks for your comments. I might have missed an earlier point you made on the list? What is your project trying to achieve? Hope this helps. Desiree -- > Hebe > > > _______________________________________________ > discuss mailing list > discuss@1net.org > http://1net-mail.1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
- Re: [iucg] [discuss] vgnic - mdrs information Desiree
- [iucg] vgnic - mdrs information Elisabeth Blanconil