Re: [Jcardcal] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-jcardcal-jcal-09
Philipp Kewisch <kewisch@gmail.com> Wed, 26 March 2014 15:25 UTC
Return-Path: <kewisch@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: jcardcal@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jcardcal@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8AD21A00FB; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 08:25:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KV9JWjmQw8UC; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 08:25:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-bk0-x236.google.com (mail-bk0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4008:c01::236]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B68531A00E3; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 08:25:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-bk0-f54.google.com with SMTP id 6so598113bkj.13 for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 08:25:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=references:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:cc:from:subject:date:to; bh=SPZQybOhD3qE9nB+TXv7yOZThAFH2nBphk6/+4Ff9sY=; b=bc7z2fP0i7R4LOp+f5RwKFz6rPqhutoFyVkv8FlN5utq6sSCcc7qHmSdShZDQl3AXm l+BTLOLiDIXzJlbpIRVi0u4Je/iymEdZ0dQUcLccriLD/E3sm4IY3PJJVSNrKmf4SgvJ ULjCCtwTMgBXqJl0SSW1YE7rI9paGc0oZ+PVrZokNMEnU/X89ZlBuWK2J9kM6Lu9/Rzv rC/kdm0WG2zQPqjfG1QxOZedZ0bPV5h9MjYm4DBsFLYpHtkxrlkjuVyAs5oMMer5sfre Y0+S52XR6d0v0YPePZS6MxgGfzINhWRv7X5JIP9JOR12SQc3Pp5pAqbzHOROkNRzfKYZ 1rgg==
X-Received: by 10.204.52.199 with SMTP id j7mr1363973bkg.57.1395847553717; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 08:25:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.47.87.222] (tmo-111-7.customers.d1-online.com. [80.187.111.7]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id xj2sm23745526bkb.15.2014.03.26.08.25.51 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 26 Mar 2014 08:25:52 -0700 (PDT)
References: <531F5C0D.5040903@nostrum.com> <532B5066.5050803@gmail.com> <532B69C8.305@nostrum.com> <532B792D.7010105@gmail.com> <532C3BC1.1000909@nostrum.com> <5332A5E7.6040403@gmail.com> <5332D481.5070207@nostrum.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <5332D481.5070207@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B62E4E93-87A1-40A5-81E0-3A1AD86A132C@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (11D169)
From: Philipp Kewisch <kewisch@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 16:25:46 +0100
To: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jcardcal/4DbZ3hADOtnN8ausBrOa6DRG9ic
Cc: "draft-ietf-jcardcal-jcal@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-jcardcal-jcal@tools.ietf.org>, "<gen-art@ietf.org> Team" <gen-art@ietf.org>, "jcardcal@ietf.org" <jcardcal@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Jcardcal] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-jcardcal-jcal-09
X-BeenThere: jcardcal@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: JSON data formats for vCard and iCalendar WG <jcardcal.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jcardcal>, <mailto:jcardcal-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/jcardcal/>
List-Post: <mailto:jcardcal@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jcardcal-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jcardcal>, <mailto:jcardcal-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 15:25:58 -0000
Ah ok, just listing the names again in a comment in the ABNF is easy enough, thats totally fine with me. Thanks, Philipp > On Mar 26, 2014, at 14:22, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> wrote: > > I'll let you work that out with Pete. > > If you do decide to list them, I wouldn't repeat their definition. > The important thing is that you verified there wasn't anything left dangling. > Thanks for taking the time to go through that again. > > RjS > >> On 3/26/14, 5:03 AM, Philipp Kewisch wrote: >>> On 3/21/14, 2:16 PM, Robert Sparks wrote: >>>> On 3/20/14, 6:26 PM, Philipp Kewisch wrote: >>>> On 3/20/14, 11:20 PM, Robert Sparks wrote: >>>>>> value-separator is defined in section 2 of rfc 7159. >>>>> Provide that reference at the point it's used in the document please. >>>> Just above the ABNF in the introduction to the section, I write "ABNF >>>> Symbols not described here are taken from [RFC7159]". Isn't that >>>> sufficient? >>> I missed it. Others are likely to as well. >>> Building an explicit list of what symbols you're counting on from that >>> document >>> would let you check that you haven't missed defining any others. >>> Putting the list >>> in the document will help others later find where to go when they're >>> missing the >>> symbol by using grep on this document. >>> (You should have that list already from the ABNF verification step you >>> performed). >>>> Philipp >> That list is quite a bit, I personally think the note at the beginning >> of the section should be sufficient. Don't you think most implementers >> will assume these rules belong to JSON and re-read the section if they >> are really looking for why the rule is missing? If you think this is a >> blocking issue, I'm happy to include it though. >> >> ; These symbols originate from RFC7159 and are only >> begin-array = ws %x5B ws ; [ left square bracket >> begin-object = ws %x7B ws ; { left curly bracket >> end-array = ws %x5D ws ; ] right square bracket >> end-object = ws %x7D ws ; } right curly bracket >> name-separator = ws %x3A ws ; : colon >> value-separator = ws %x2C ws ; , comma >> string = quotation-mark *char quotation-mark >> quotation-mark = %x22 ; " >> ws = *( %x20 / %x09 / %x0A / %x0D ) ; Space, Horizontal tab, line feed >> ; or new line, carriage return >> false = %x66.61.6c.73.65 ; false >> true = %x74.72.75.65 ; true >> number = [ minus ] int [ frac ] [ exp ] >> decimal-point = %x2E ; . >> digit1-9 = %x31-39 ; 1-9 >> e = %x65 / %x45 ; e E >> exp = e [ minus / plus ] 1*DIGIT >> frac = decimal-point 1*DIGIT >> int = zero / ( digit1-9 *DIGIT ) >> minus = %x2D ; - >> plus = %x2B ; + >> zero = %x30 ; 0 >
- [Jcardcal] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-jcardcal-… Robert Sparks
- Re: [Jcardcal] [Gen-art] Genart LC review: draft-… Robert Sparks
- Re: [Jcardcal] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-jcard… Philipp Kewisch
- Re: [Jcardcal] [Gen-art] Genart LC review: draft-… Philipp Kewisch
- Re: [Jcardcal] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-jcard… Robert Sparks
- Re: [Jcardcal] [Gen-art] Genart LC review: draft-… Robert Sparks
- Re: [Jcardcal] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-jcard… Pete Resnick
- Re: [Jcardcal] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-jcard… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [Jcardcal] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-jcard… Philipp Kewisch
- Re: [Jcardcal] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-jcard… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [Jcardcal] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-jcard… Philipp Kewisch
- Re: [Jcardcal] [Gen-art] Genart LC review: draft-… Jari Arkko
- Re: [Jcardcal] [Gen-art] Genart LC review: draft-… Philipp Kewisch
- Re: [Jcardcal] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-jcard… Philipp Kewisch
- Re: [Jcardcal] [Gen-art] Genart LC review: draft-… Philipp Kewisch
- Re: [Jcardcal] [Gen-art] Genart LC review: draft-… Philipp Kewisch
- Re: [Jcardcal] [Gen-art] Genart LC review: draft-… Philipp Kewisch
- Re: [Jcardcal] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-jcard… Robert Sparks
- Re: [Jcardcal] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-jcard… Philipp Kewisch
- Re: [Jcardcal] [Gen-art] Genart LC review: draft-… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [Jcardcal] [Gen-art] Genart LC review: draft-… Philipp Kewisch
- Re: [Jcardcal] [Gen-art] Genart LC review: draft-… Peter Saint-Andre