IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Jcardcal] Last Minute jCal changes? RSCALE extension might mess with data type

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Thu, 03 April 2014 14:45 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: jcardcal@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jcardcal@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CB2F1A01D7 for <jcardcal@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Apr 2014 07:45:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lAVhiECzrG2y for <jcardcal@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Apr 2014 07:45:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F84E1A01C2 for <jcardcal@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Apr 2014 07:45:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aither.local (unknown [24.8.184.175]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3ADC64010C; Thu, 3 Apr 2014 08:45:46 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <533D7419.8080108@stpeter.im>
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2014 08:45:45 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Philipp Kewisch <kewisch@gmail.com>, Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>, Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>, bert.greevenbosch@huawei.com
References: <533D55F0.6020608@gmail.com> <533D6768.4000808@stpeter.im> <7D633CDA8E408479C296FC81@caldav.corp.apple.com> <533D6966.9070701@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <533D6966.9070701@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jcardcal/E9DZLxqNho6npN-Ymmplt6WmN4g
Cc: draft-daboo-icalendar-rscale@tools.ietf.org, jcardcal@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Jcardcal] Last Minute jCal changes? RSCALE extension might mess with data type
X-BeenThere: jcardcal@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: JSON data formats for vCard and iCalendar WG <jcardcal.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jcardcal>, <mailto:jcardcal-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/jcardcal/>
List-Post: <mailto:jcardcal@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jcardcal-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jcardcal>, <mailto:jcardcal-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2014 14:45:59 -0000

On 4/3/14, 8:00 AM, Philipp Kewisch wrote:
> On 4/3/14, 3:57 PM, Cyrus Daboo wrote:
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> --On April 3, 2014 at 7:51:36 AM -0600 Peter Saint-Andre
>> <stpeter@stpeter.im> wrote:
>>
>>> With my WG chair hat on, I have concerns.
>>>
>>> Why is the RSCALE draft modifying an existing element from RFC 5545
>>> instead of defining a new element? How certain are we that the draft
>>> Cyrus and Gregory are working on will end up changing monthnum? Do we
>>> really want to be tracking an I-D with an uncertain future?
>>>
>>> It seems more prudent, at this late date, to align only with RFC 5545.
>>
>> I would agree that jcal should not change at this point. RSCALE is
>> still a draft and can be changed if real problems are encountered.
>>
> Hi Peter, Cyrus,
>
> thanks for letting me know. I would also prefer not to make any further
> changes to jCal, I just wanted to bring it up in case someone thinks
> otherwise.

I am glad you noticed, since it shows that you're actually writing and 
testing code. :-) But I'm also glad that Cyrus thinks it's best to leave 
jCal alone for now.

Peter

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email