Re: [Jcardcal] [Gen-art] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-jcardcal-jcal-09
Philipp Kewisch <kewisch@gmail.com> Thu, 27 March 2014 17:19 UTC
Return-Path: <kewisch@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: jcardcal@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jcardcal@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 848471A06A3; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 10:19:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OS0EwQ4yNCRC; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 10:19:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-bk0-x22c.google.com (mail-bk0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4008:c01::22c]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 125051A032F; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 10:19:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-bk0-f44.google.com with SMTP id mz13so816899bkb.3 for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 10:19:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=references:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:cc:from:subject:date:to; bh=C2I9QbNd2jBGKx3e0F8Jkf03Spa8m9pzxyRS8J3quAE=; b=fpbRc85t+a1XTQmyfWm9+LcCoUoIELpcCQyer7UK0deSRbBzYdg66cB+7Gu1cbuYAh uYDVArPkae4pEJNipKOEJG4slwzzV1azilhX/hORYIl7y5jfHFRQln45JgJ/FBjkpwko xMizSlBceqIzqf47bdLNtIlMhIr0XJX7ybgPxgpV8vgEc9pAbO2S2u4SqmQeeJfR2H4g PlSYKqggtNSX1fPYIsR3EpbCSiHqdBnduJWB/IlFRB+i6dx0nkJw6u4o3OHoEqWMXfyH QPg2+47RxAiAI0o4JVuMLnVMjH0Pj9Wv/EBYLNUjSm7Z2sMU1/luiLOBMaysxMR/2jsi 53Zg==
X-Received: by 10.204.59.197 with SMTP id m5mr3470499bkh.27.1395940778656; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 10:19:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.47.87.222] (tmo-111-7.customers.d1-online.com. [80.187.111.7]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ez1sm2707088bkb.2.2014.03.27.10.19.36 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 27 Mar 2014 10:19:37 -0700 (PDT)
References: <531F5C0D.5040903@nostrum.com> <3FA85917-2D35-4A33-955E-AF4644202C94@piuha.net> <53329329.8040100@gmail.com> <5332BA94.8010907@gmail.com> <533458B1.5020603@stpeter.im>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <533458B1.5020603@stpeter.im>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <295BA67B-DD6A-415A-B47D-65F88D6A857E@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (11D169)
From: Philipp Kewisch <kewisch@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 18:19:28 +0100
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jcardcal/F48-PgBxnRNeNiWAV66flmi8TMQ
Cc: "draft-ietf-jcardcal-jcal@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-jcardcal-jcal@tools.ietf.org>, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>, "jcardcal@ietf.org" <jcardcal@ietf.org>, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Subject: Re: [Jcardcal] [Gen-art] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-jcardcal-jcal-09
X-BeenThere: jcardcal@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: JSON data formats for vCard and iCalendar WG <jcardcal.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jcardcal>, <mailto:jcardcal-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/jcardcal/>
List-Post: <mailto:jcardcal@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jcardcal-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jcardcal>, <mailto:jcardcal-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 17:19:43 -0000
> On Mar 27, 2014, at 17:58, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> wrote: > >> On 3/26/14, 5:31 AM, Philipp Kewisch wrote: >> I have just uploaded a new version of the document, it contains all >> considerations from the Gen-ART and secdir review, as well as changes >> based on the IESG evaluations. >> >> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-jcardcal-jcal-10.txt >> >> There are still 1-2 issues where I am waiting on email replies, but I >> wanted to have a version ready for the IESG Telechat tomorrow. > > Have you received replies to those email messages? I have answered all emails I am aware of. I also mentioned the new version on this gen-art thread. > >> To jcarcal folks: I'd apprecicate if you could take a look at >> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jcardcal/trac/ and comment on the >> outstanding issues. > > I looked at the issues you posted here: > > http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jcardcal/trac/report/1 > > I think 66 and 68 can be closed because they were fixed in version -10, right? Yes, I believe so too. > > I think 69 deserves to be wontfix, because it's easy enough to find the relevant ABNF constructions in RFC 7159. However, for completeness you could list them individually. As far as I can see, the constructions we include are: > > begin-array > begin-object > end-array > end-object > name-separator > value-separator > string > number > true > false I don't mind mentioning these, I can upload a new version with this if you like. Or can we have this added by the editor? > > IMHO 67 is a nice little research project but I don't particularly think it's necessary to complete that research in order to advance the jCal specification. I agree. Philipp
- [Jcardcal] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-jcardcal-… Robert Sparks
- Re: [Jcardcal] [Gen-art] Genart LC review: draft-… Robert Sparks
- Re: [Jcardcal] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-jcard… Philipp Kewisch
- Re: [Jcardcal] [Gen-art] Genart LC review: draft-… Philipp Kewisch
- Re: [Jcardcal] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-jcard… Robert Sparks
- Re: [Jcardcal] [Gen-art] Genart LC review: draft-… Robert Sparks
- Re: [Jcardcal] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-jcard… Pete Resnick
- Re: [Jcardcal] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-jcard… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [Jcardcal] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-jcard… Philipp Kewisch
- Re: [Jcardcal] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-jcard… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [Jcardcal] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-jcard… Philipp Kewisch
- Re: [Jcardcal] [Gen-art] Genart LC review: draft-… Jari Arkko
- Re: [Jcardcal] [Gen-art] Genart LC review: draft-… Philipp Kewisch
- Re: [Jcardcal] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-jcard… Philipp Kewisch
- Re: [Jcardcal] [Gen-art] Genart LC review: draft-… Philipp Kewisch
- Re: [Jcardcal] [Gen-art] Genart LC review: draft-… Philipp Kewisch
- Re: [Jcardcal] [Gen-art] Genart LC review: draft-… Philipp Kewisch
- Re: [Jcardcal] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-jcard… Robert Sparks
- Re: [Jcardcal] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-jcard… Philipp Kewisch
- Re: [Jcardcal] [Gen-art] Genart LC review: draft-… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [Jcardcal] [Gen-art] Genart LC review: draft-… Philipp Kewisch
- Re: [Jcardcal] [Gen-art] Genart LC review: draft-… Peter Saint-Andre