Re: [Jcardcal] [Gen-art] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-jcardcal-jcal-09

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Thu, 27 March 2014 16:58 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: jcardcal@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jcardcal@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6625A1A032A; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 09:58:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eVdtz0MTGVeG; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 09:58:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C47F31A00E3; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 09:58:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aither.local (unknown [24.8.129.242]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D707C4010C; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 10:58:25 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <533458B1.5020603@stpeter.im>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 10:58:25 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Philipp Kewisch <kewisch@gmail.com>, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
References: <531F5C0D.5040903@nostrum.com> <3FA85917-2D35-4A33-955E-AF4644202C94@piuha.net> <53329329.8040100@gmail.com> <5332BA94.8010907@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5332BA94.8010907@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jcardcal/PSWuFJ2qsHh4hu0xWhoIB7GK-mI
Cc: draft-ietf-jcardcal-jcal@tools.ietf.org, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, jcardcal@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Jcardcal] [Gen-art] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-jcardcal-jcal-09
X-BeenThere: jcardcal@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: JSON data formats for vCard and iCalendar WG <jcardcal.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jcardcal>, <mailto:jcardcal-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/jcardcal/>
List-Post: <mailto:jcardcal@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jcardcal-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jcardcal>, <mailto:jcardcal-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 16:58:32 -0000

On 3/26/14, 5:31 AM, Philipp Kewisch wrote:
> I have just uploaded a new version of the document, it contains all
> considerations from the Gen-ART and secdir review, as well as changes
> based on the IESG evaluations.
>
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-jcardcal-jcal-10.txt
>
> There are still 1-2 issues where I am waiting on email replies, but I
> wanted to have a version ready for the IESG Telechat tomorrow.

Have you received replies to those email messages?

> To jcarcal folks: I'd apprecicate if you could take a look at
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jcardcal/trac/ and comment on the
> outstanding issues.

I looked at the issues you posted here:

http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jcardcal/trac/report/1

I think 66 and 68 can be closed because they were fixed in version -10, 
right?

I think 69 deserves to be wontfix, because it's easy enough to find the 
relevant ABNF constructions in RFC 7159. However, for completeness you 
could list them individually. As far as I can see, the constructions we 
include are:

begin-array
begin-object
end-array
end-object
name-separator
value-separator
string
number
true
false

IMHO 67 is a nice little research project but I don't particularly think 
it's necessary to complete that research in order to advance the jCal 
specification.

Peter