[JMAP] Question about shareWith property in RFC 9670 vs RFC 8621
Mauro De Gennaro <mauro@stalw.art> Mon, 22 September 2025 14:07 UTC
Return-Path: <mauro@stalw.art>
X-Original-To: jmap@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: jmap@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 600CA66C5EAF for <jmap@mail2.ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Sep 2025 07:07:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=stalw.art header.b="W1CF/E4T"; dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=stalw.art header.b="qRre0Vbi"
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9ONzTVsMqmdY for <jmap@mail2.ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Sep 2025 07:07:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.stalw.art (mail.stalw.art [135.181.195.209]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7E8366C5EA9 for <jmap@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Sep 2025 07:07:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=202404r; d=stalw.art; c=relaxed/relaxed; h=To:Date:Message-Id:Subject:From; t=1758550063; bh=SuODu/vy46E8vYkTw73LhYo RnSpDEnKxrTaXsZQcEBo=; b=W1CF/E4Tjnikgy7gSDzrk/wem9y+Nnn6isB0aIilQnVRlBr1zr 3Q5CRakqpKOhbyhWWT1hlk+4raC4CT2qJ310aNp69BQQzlv0yuEz1k3OsMo2ID0RuuI7RfzbmEG 5TsEwmGdYTewiM+euklO0bfcZSbymAIgdfGSH6eu6doUXRIdSHqH9MiTahUdwPqmYTeCnSJHkhX GL81y2vXxWne1Tx4JuMGDYXaJbST1kdAQQB8YIUbSoT6M2YMnpMvGdKhj9ACPLXqSBSIQddP6wF b4tD74WpKNWv8Yo5Iu4PGE+2XGO4RhQPR2QrjXIjBtA2n4OOEOA+tF852PF+ADofu7g==;
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; s=202404e; d=stalw.art; c=relaxed/relaxed; h=To:Date:Message-Id:Subject:From; t=1758550063; bh=SuODu/vy46E8vYkTw73LhYo RnSpDEnKxrTaXsZQcEBo=; b=qRre0VbiRK0/o1/bTJuYy4Z57r8bkBAGpoe+WpcExSAq+8a14q xjM2Sk8cVjeHEUCwAtSsUz6qWkdfvflUsZAg==;
From: Mauro De Gennaro <mauro@stalw.art>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.700.6.1.11\))
Message-Id: <FEA43A8C-F1A5-4EB8-A87F-40DCC8ADAF84@stalw.art>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2025 16:07:32 +0200
To: IETF JMAP Mailing List <jmap@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.700.6.1.11)
Message-ID-Hash: ZL2YGYIGMOFVKD6YTGGKPSVROL2SIXUE
X-Message-ID-Hash: ZL2YGYIGMOFVKD6YTGGKPSVROL2SIXUE
X-MailFrom: mauro@stalw.art
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-jmap.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [JMAP] Question about shareWith property in RFC 9670 vs RFC 8621
List-Id: JSON Meta Access Protocol <jmap.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jmap/-oCzocycNZPpZAF2E0oMnD3Sryg>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jmap>
List-Help: <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:jmap-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:jmap@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:jmap-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:jmap-leave@ietf.org>
Hi Niel, I’m currently working on an implementation of RFC 9670, and I’ve run into something I’d like to clarify. In Section 4 (Framework for Shared Data), it says that shareable data types MUST define the properties isSubscribed, myRights, and shareWith. That all makes sense, but when I went back to RFC 8621, I couldn’t find a definition for the shareWith property. I will implement sharing for JMAP for Mail under the assumption that shareWith exists, but I wanted to check with you whether RFC 8621 still needs to be updated to include this property, or if it was already defined in another document that I may have missed. Thanks, Mauro
- [JMAP] Question about shareWith property in RFC 9… Mauro De Gennaro
- [JMAP] Re: Question about shareWith property in R… Neil Jenkins
- [JMAP] Re: Question about shareWith property in R… Mauro De Gennaro