[Jmap] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-jmap-smime-09: (with COMMENT)

[Warren Kumari via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-jmap-smime-09: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/blog/handling-iesg-ballot-positions/
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-jmap-smime/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks to Menachem Dodge for the OpsDir review; I see that the author has
incorporated / addressed many of the comments/nits, but I don't think I saw any
sort of discussion around the "Please consider whether the document header
should indicate "Updates: 8621"." (which Benjamin also referenced).

It is entirely possible that I completely missed any discussions, but I'd be
interested in an answer if possible.