Re: [Jmap] the large email (attachment) problem
Richard Clayton <richard@highwayman.com> Mon, 02 August 2021 09:17 UTC
Return-Path: <richard@highwayman.com>
X-Original-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A06243A1507 for <jmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 02:17:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M58XM7Md6NM4 for <jmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 02:17:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.highwayman.com (mail.highwayman.com [82.69.6.249]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E3DD3A1504 for <jmap@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 02:17:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33289 helo=happyday.al.cl.cam.ac.uk) by mail.highwayman.com with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <richard@highwayman.com>) id 1mAU4n-000BEM-Di for jmap@ietf.org; Mon, 02 Aug 2021 09:17:37 +0000
Message-ID: <H$xCpTKuf7BhFAU9@highwayman.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2021 10:16:30 +0100
To: jmap@ietf.org
From: Richard Clayton <richard@highwayman.com>
References: <CAJi=jadiwMGvLXG7nK93Ht=TzN-QdmAqyE4Nf7UnGG47f3zSwg@mail.gmail.com> <20210731170047.DE0772563EB0@ary.qy> <YQbPLiMLCVowKgyj@eh> <44b8d21-afd9-6563-bcb0-2ad0d23154a1@taugh.com> <f4f83442-e8c0-42f3-98c6-4c3cb73340c4@dogfood.fastmail.com> <3b47db73-3d30-4019-ad1c-0b3dfd187305@beta.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <3b47db73-3d30-4019-ad1c-0b3dfd187305@beta.fastmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Turnpike Integrated Version 5.03 M <fg5$+XsT77fOLMKLtWR+duN3ac>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jmap/7t52KVNBDLjYn0sF9s2CU3cZzMY>
Subject: Re: [Jmap] the large email (attachment) problem
X-BeenThere: jmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: JSON Message Access Protocol <jmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jmap/>
List-Post: <mailto:jmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2021 09:17:50 -0000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 In message <3b47db73-3d30-4019-ad1c-0b3dfd187305@beta.fastmail.com>, Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com> writes > I'm particularly interested in anyone who knows any clients which > currently implement message/external-body at all, so we can check > that they handle any changes we make to the format. my client (Turnpike) will handle incoming message/external-body but does not generate it https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turnpike_(software) I still use this software every day (see headers), but I haven't seen an example of this MIME type for many years (the IETF used to use it for their notifications of new RFCs and drafts) BTW: there are surely other WGs where any MIME extension work (if you want to add content hashes perhaps, to assist in abuse prevention) will be better handled. If you just want to encourage the use of this MIME type then I doubt it matters where you do it ! - -- richard Richard Clayton Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. Benjamin Franklin 11 Nov 1755 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPsdk version 1.7.1 iQA/AwUBYQe37t2nQQHFxEViEQKSSgCdHHTWoIyPrg1tNCbho0W/rnz8S9sAoK6p BTcpMW9VBJQUNeC/GBjhgJSO =kUpB -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- [Jmap] the large email (attachment) problem Jamey Sharp
- Re: [Jmap] the large email (attachment) problem John Levine
- Re: [Jmap] the large email (attachment) problem Jamey Sharp
- Re: [Jmap] the large email (attachment) problem John R Levine
- Re: [Jmap] the large email (attachment) problem Neil Jenkins
- Re: [Jmap] the large email (attachment) problem Bron Gondwana
- Re: [Jmap] the large email (attachment) problem Richard Clayton
- Re: [Jmap] the large email (attachment) problem John Levine
- Re: [Jmap] the large email (attachment) problem Neil Jenkins
- Re: [Jmap] the large email (attachment) problem John R Levine