IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Jmap] draft-ietf-jmap-smime reference to RFC 5257

Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com> Thu, 21 October 2021 23:31 UTC

Return-Path: <brong@fastmailteam.com>
X-Original-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F3A13A0E7B for <jmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 16:31:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.101
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fastmailteam.com header.b=w5f6Z7Td; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=mXeh12wa
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Sb9GzYTxZgtE for <jmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 16:31:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA9253A0E7A for <jmap@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 16:31:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C98B3201126 for <jmap@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 19:31:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap43 ([10.202.2.93]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 21 Oct 2021 19:31:33 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= fastmailteam.com; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to :references:date:from:to:subject:content-type; s=fm1; bh=RZ5U4Gs Ys2chMOR8vLDnqljiEAfRE+HIJO3hCB4oFLE=; b=w5f6Z7Td/iB/fBa1YjNG0Dl AqVg2bLn5kberngROHVS4jr+uhQ/ou/HcuPc15e+J4iNS+7Zc5yGx456IidqDZV3 y2wzsmr9IJWFCFMheGdOYS+3VD/ZEnzwjXa+hzKF5zIdMzbkJM3DiIWR8RXwzeLJ kC5GiZ5BDeI8kcyp1qOIRDMGc0A/SSvKA9erqPn4yxX8es6gsEws0G7OEvKercn7 U/q0FqtJZQ931IPtbXV1tji5CUDxHsPJstBLS50VMnzFcB7Iu9TPLSgQfLuPyKbG MifTJezOCxsUMRjsejFFeHdXuoV2kFSIOpIkfTbdES+rxi5FMEF3/7cs/P8o5CQ= =
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=RZ5U4G sYs2chMOR8vLDnqljiEAfRE+HIJO3hCB4oFLE=; b=mXeh12waeanElUuLBDxAlQ gXdrnR3sSlToaueK7IesKLFttA9pI5sLgTJCmdISmIbDx4mWHG/aJXfybs03RMIm 4PPePmvnEMYKmmTvfkNk4LAQ3GeUNk1fF4K9TpJgNlBqE/A1j4aN2jehIVTJZVTP EenF0K5qIb8f3FP1BogW+Qz/1fo3ple5FotscJKhDbpPVOtMCprR4Q+XBySyy4qn van19yINpGKr3YPvdAWIuRcROs/oreCTwSX+34F4jlCWJI7SF2JgqKyaktZYqOOr TlReLz2Nu60eokNSnO6Jb7Pds6VkQNM5OLYEWiEUTtDVlKFhSKPi5va9mfBRLwHA ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:VfhxYUCjCjll3ansJZLfMrQdjd4wZcuWoz8ElZK9WAdWiw1FFIUGlQ> <xme:VfhxYWgeKR8dULnPAtQZ_mDVZjoZTvp_kY4F9Pvm-a5DIM1QgB9DdsOnkPRoEHw0l 1G5bGUdGyY>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrvddvjedgvddtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvufgtsegrtd erreerredtnecuhfhrohhmpedfuehrohhnucfiohhnugifrghnrgdfuceosghrohhnghes fhgrshhtmhgrihhlthgvrghmrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedvudeuieehgf dvheeuueejjeeuudfgiefgveetfeelteeffffgtdejjefgueduvdenucevlhhushhtvghr ufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegsrhhonhhgsehfrghsthhmrg hilhhtvggrmhdrtghomh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:VfhxYXm6E2WDD_noXlERJJMWK3oxYKoRNPL0Uh80AUcGM65raB-2Gg> <xmx:VfhxYayHXt1sDKiy4XbWej9_WSWSBeW5XP_Dd5RgBFzU7AHDAsjx6A> <xmx:VfhxYZQQ-KW8rn4St39PHz8KFMGsawvLomoXCYiG0o5ZBlInM99QfQ> <xmx:VfhxYQc2VNojOxaGSaZDwFPOIWs-YRXmZLWxAaJkaiI9u1gf6YCNEw>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 0B247AC03DB; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 19:31:33 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.5.0-alpha0-1369-gd055fb5e7c-fm-20211018.002-gd055fb5e
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <b89db747-41b9-41e9-89b0-ea2abcc52a27@dogfood.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwYfeXSc7KedMvXJagZeG30y53yFCEYsTUnbh9MSE8H7MQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAL0qLwYfeXSc7KedMvXJagZeG30y53yFCEYsTUnbh9MSE8H7MQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2021 10:31:12 +1100
From: Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com>
To: jmap@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="40838143b53b479299c745b86da4f176"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jmap/JG7cvAsYnyQ30kY8HK-WwVBT6iY>
Subject: Re: [Jmap] draft-ietf-jmap-smime reference to RFC 5257
X-BeenThere: jmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: JSON Message Access Protocol <jmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jmap/>
List-Post: <mailto:jmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 23:31:41 -0000

On Fri, Oct 22, 2021, at 01:45, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> Hi, me again,
> 
> The IESG just evaluated draft-ietf-jmap-smime and the topic of its downref to RFC 5257 came up.  There's nothing wrong with the downref, we just discussed the process in this particular case because there was prior talk that this RFC should be upgraded to the standards track.  I seem to recall the vibe about this when I first asked about it was "Yes, we should do this, but not at this time."  Accordingly, the IESG will be adding it to the downref registry.
> 
> Just checking: Does JMAP plan to take up that work at some point, or is the sentiment more like "This is ripe for the standards track, and someone should do this someday, but not us"?
> 
> Perhaps it's more aligned with EXTRA's charter?

Yes, I'd say that EXTRA is the place to do the work.  I'd be particularly interested in having feedback from servers that don't implement it about why they haven't, if we were to do more than just bless the exact existing design as non-experimental.

Bron.

--
  Bron Gondwana, CEO, Fastmail Pty Ltd
  brong@fastmailteam.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email