[Jmap] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-jmap-websocket-04: (with COMMENT)

Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 06 January 2020 17:14 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: jmap@ietf.org
Delivered-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AC3B12086C; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 09:14:36 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-jmap-websocket@ietf.org, Jim Fenton <fenton@bluepopcorn.net>, jmap-chairs@ietf.org, fenton@bluepopcorn.net, jmap@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.115.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
Message-ID: <157833087603.7991.7955347162905703406.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2020 09:14:36 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jmap/KY3Ki_s3v66BEhhZsAheOpLxZXE>
Subject: [Jmap] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-jmap-websocket-04: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: jmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: JSON Message Access Protocol <jmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jmap/>
List-Post: <mailto:jmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2020 17:14:36 -0000

Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-jmap-websocket-04: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-jmap-websocket/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

The TSV-ART review (Thanks Bob!) flagged an issue about further discussing
failure cases. Alexey indicated that the spec should add more text about this,
however, no update has been posted since. I assume this will be addressed
before publication, as Alexey is aware, so I'm balloting no objection.