Re: [Jmap] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-jmap-mdn-15: (with COMMENT)

Raphaël Ouazana <rouazana@linagora.com> Thu, 10 December 2020 18:31 UTC

Return-Path: <rouazana@linagora.com>
X-Original-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B820F3A1195; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 10:31:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hy7MQsyqWRc1; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 10:31:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.linagora.com (smtp.linagora.com [54.36.8.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B359B3A118B; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 10:30:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.37] (91-168-246-100.subs.proxad.net [91.168.246.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.linagora.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 89059484AC; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 19:24:32 +0100 (CET)
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, Murray Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
Cc: jmap-chairs@ietf.org, IETF JMAP Mailing List <jmap@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-jmap-mdn@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com>
References: <160139528034.2924.9672441697416964848@ietfa.amsl.com> <CALaySJKWgBaZnYXk9TrZTCWXjeQHc=duaqPPf_avG1X504-LFQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-LINAGORA-Copy-Delivery-Done: 1
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Rapha=c3=abl_Ouazana?= <rouazana@linagora.com>
Message-ID: <117b0ab7-577c-1798-5e9c-bea7497e1f50@linagora.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 19:24:32 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJKWgBaZnYXk9TrZTCWXjeQHc=duaqPPf_avG1X504-LFQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jmap/MyCzfhGVuwyaYo6iXeTX-wIqXd0>
Subject: Re: [Jmap] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-jmap-mdn-15: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: jmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: JSON Message Access Protocol <jmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jmap/>
List-Post: <mailto:jmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 18:31:02 -0000

> I agree that we should simply spell out "identifier", and I strongly
> encourage that change.
As told, I prefer to keep "id" because RFC8620 and RF8621 use almost 
only this term.